Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Underhill try should have stood - Farrell

By Tom Webber

Owen Farrell was not overly disheartened by England’s 16-15 loss to New Zealand at Twickenham on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks overturned a 15-point deficit to take the lead in the second half, but England were denied a 75th-minute try when Courtney Lawes was deemed offside by TMO Marius Jonker after Sam Underhill dived over in the corner.

Eddie Jones side were this time on the wrong side of a marginal decision, having seen Farrell get away with a controversial tackle on Andre Esterhuizen beyond the 80th minute in a 12-11 win over South Africa last weekend.

The Saracens fly-half was not overly frustrated with the call because his primary focus is on beating the best teams in the world at the Rugby World Cup in Japan next year.

“We are growing all the time – I don’t think we want it all smooth sailing, we want to peak in 2019,” the fly-half told Sky Sports.

“Of course, we want to win now, that’s exactly what we want to do, but we can use this [defeat]. We played okay but there’s a lot to work on. We are pushing the best teams and we want to be the best.

“Obviously, there were going to be mistakes with this kind of weather, but I’m proud of the way we stuck in there.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked if he thought Underhill’s try should have stood, he added: “I thought so, yeah. But I probably would do!

“That’s rugby, isn’t it? These decisions can go with and against you. Today it didn’t [go with us].”

New Zealand captain Kieran Read was pleased to be going away from Twickenham with a win – his 100th as an All Black in 116 Tests.

“Obviously there is a lot of relief – that was hell of a Test,” said Read.

“To go 15 points down we really had to go to the well. To keep the English to no points after 20 minutes is some effort.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 2 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks Sevens playmaker whose name is now next to Jonah Lomu and Christian Cullen All Blacks Sevens playmaker named HK's best
Search