Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Lam hits back at Hansen over 'ex-New Zealander' jibe

Steve Hansen and Pat Lam in 2011

Connacht head coach Pat Lam has taken exception to Steve Hansen referring to him as an “ex-New Zealander” in a row over the future of the All Blacks‘ Steven Luatua.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand boss Hansen was upset by Luatua’s decision to join Bristol for the 2017-18 season – where Lam will take over as coach after finishing his spell with Connacht.

Hansen was not impressed with Lam’s role in Luatua’s move.

“He [Luatua] spoke briefly to the contracts team and he’s been tapped on the shoulder by Pat Lam which is disappointing too,” Hansen told Fairfax Media.

“If you’re an ex-New Zealander you should be a bit mindful about players’ careers.”

Lam, who was born in Auckland and played one Test for the All Blacks before representing Samoa at three World Cups, was bemused by Hansen’s criticism.

“I am not sure why Steve Hansen would unprecedentedly choose to single me out publicly and call me an ‘ex-New Zealander’,” he said.

“I am a proud New Zealander and I’m also proud to be a Pacific Islander.

“The only reason we don’t live in New Zealand at the moment is I had an opportunity to continue to coach rugby professionally in Ireland and support my family after being sacked by the NZRU and the Blues.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Did Steve Hansen consider himself an ex-New Zealander when he chose to leave New Zealand and coach the Wales national team against the All Blacks?

“Myself and I’m sure many other New Zealanders who are living and working overseas do not consider ourselves ex-New Zealanders just because we are not living in New Zealand.

“When I have joined the thousands of other northern-based Kiwis who attended and cheered on the All Blacks in their test matches in the northern hemisphere we certainly didn’t do so as ex-New Zealanders.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT