Northern | US

'I've seen the offer that Samu was given and it was a very, very good offer'


Samu Kerevi. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Wallabies’ director of rugby Scott Johnson said Rugby Australia couldn’t have done more to keep star centre Samu Kerevi.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Queensland captain will play his final Super Rugby match on Saturday night against the Brumbies and play in Japan following this year’s World Cup after knocking back a “very, very good offer”, according to Johnson.

Johnson said Rugby Australia didn’t want to lose a player in their prime and had done their best to keep the 25-year-old, who has played 23 Tests.

“Let’s get it straight, the offer was good,” Johnson said on Thursday.

“I’ve seen the offer that Samu was given and it was a very, very good offer that would have put him in the higher echelons of our country.”

Johnson, who joined the Wallabies set-up from Scotland in March, said Kerevi’s situation was “complex” and alluded to his extended family commitments.

“It’s not perfect for him and for us and we understand there are issues away from the game for him.

“It opens the door for other players who we may be talking about in a different light in 12 months time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking at a Melbourne Rebels function, Johnson said he backed Rugby Australia’s current policy of only selecting players who played Super Rugby or Test veterans with 60 caps who could be included under “Giteau’s Law”.

“I think the key component is that we have a responsibility to make sure our competition is the best in the world,” he said.

“It’s great to be able to control the player – their strength and conditioning and their skill development.

“We understand there are challenges but at the moment we think there’s a nice mix of rewarding longevity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Wallabies, Brumbies and Rebels captain Stirling Mortlock said the game was being wrecked by the loss of players such as Kerevi and the self-interest of Super Rugby clubs.

“It’s a massive challenge and if we don’t get our house in order in four years time we will have to change the eligibility rule because you might have a lot of players not in Super Rugby,’ Mortlock said.

“It baffles me that we still haven’t got our house in order with everyone pulling in the same direction.

“We’ve got still different factions in different areas looking after their own backyard and that’s what’s stifling us.

“The New Zealand model is all about creating great All Blacks and everyone club and player knows that but it doesn’t happen in this country.”

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 34 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close