Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Is this just another nail in the coffin of PREM clubs?': Budget bombshell

The Chancellor of the Exchequer's budget may have made it more difficult for Gallagher PREM clubs to sign box-office players like former Bristol star Charles Piutau (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves could have just made it even harder for Gallagher PREM clubs to compete with Top 14 clubs at the top end of the transfer market.

ADVERTISEMENT

PREM clubs already find it hard enough to sign the best foreign talent, but could now find it even more difficult after finding significant changes to the way image rights payments are taxed hidden away in last week’s budget.

HM Treasury is seeking to raise an extra £40 million a year, mainly from football, by making all image rights payments subject to income tax and both employer and employee National Insurance Contributions (NICs) from April 2027.

VIDEO

Under the current system, clubs contract a player’s image rights company for commercial services, which are excluded from PAYE (45 per cent) & NIC (two per cent), but instead the companies pay corporation tax of between 20-25 per cent.

PREM clubs could face huge bills. With employer NICs currently at 15 per cent, they are now free of the tax charge and may have to pay more on ‘net’ contracts to compensate for higher tax burdens.

“They have thrown out a little hand grenade. Typically, in rugby, you work on 20 per cent image rights unless you are Jonny Wilkinson or Dan Carter,” a source told RugbyPass

“What many players do is they build it up as a pot, then when they are in a low tax position, you distribute it as you would a dividend from a company.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The impact on rugby will be more significant because rugby doesn’t have the coffers to pay 15 per cent more.

“Take, say, Charles Piutau: when he signed for Bristol Bears, that deal included a 20 per cent image rights payment. So let’s say the deal was worth £1m and 20 per cent was image rights, not through employment. So now if I want that gross £1m, I have to make the contract worth £1.2m to cover that loss.

“We are already having this push-pull with the Top 14 because we cannot compete financially. Is this just another nail in the coffin of the PREM clubs who are going to struggle to attract big-name players?”

Related


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
J
JW 11 days ago

“We are already having this push-pull with the Top 14 because we cannot compete financially. Is this just another nail in the coffin of the PREM clubs who are going to struggle to attract big-name players?”

That’s alright, we are told you are better off having them there and using them anyway.


Given that the .2 extra for a rugby player its likely to be more than a million for a football player, wouldn’t that make it more like 40Bn a year? 40mil seems weak.

L
LT 11 days ago

In the best light this is a speculative non-story, at worst it's the clickbait stuff I'd expect to see on ruck.co.uk

P
PMcD 11 days ago

I don’t think it makes a massive difference in the overall scheme of things, the PREM can compete for marquee players (Finn Russell, Fin Smith, George Ford, Maro Itoje etc) but it’s the next 5 best players at clubs where we are losing, as we simply can’t compete against the spending power of the Top 14, hence why the likes of Jack Willis, Thomas Du Toit, LD Du Preez, D Du Preez, Montoya, Jonny Hill etc have left.


That’s where we are currently feeling the pain at the moment because we can’t offer them enough to stay.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT