Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ian Foster has his say on rugby's new law interpretations

Ian Foster. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Earlier this week, World Rugby released a new ‘Law application guideline’ concerning how breakdowns and rucks should be policed.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the time, chairman Bill Beaumont made it clear that the laws of the game weren’t changing but it was important to clear up some ambiguity in the laws.

Anthony Watson takes on Billy Burns in the last sixteen of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros competition:

Video Spacer

“The breakdown is the most dynamic facet of the game and it is increasingly difficult to referee, but just as importantly, it is responsible for nine per cent of match injuries,” said Beaumont.

“Therefore it was important that we looked to identify ways to reduce the risk of injury, while promoting a fair contest for the ball.

“The [specialist breakdown] group looked at a range of potential solutions, including potential law trials, but they unanimously agreed that the best practical and evidenced approach is to reinforce existing law, rather than law change.”

Said group was comprised from top members of the rugby community from around the world, including former Ireland coach Joe Schmidt, referees Jaco Peyper and Waynes Barnes, and former All Black Victor Vito.

ADVERTISEMENT

New All Blacks coach Ian Foster was another high-profile member of the team and broadly backed the new policies.

“We had strong agreement not to add any more layers of law or interpretation, but to really focus on the critical parts of law we all agree make a difference at the breakdown,” Foster told NZ media outlet Stuff.

“The reason the meeting was successful was because we didn’t introduce stuff. We actually had clearer conversations about what’s working. Things like keeping focus on tacklers getting away from the ball, keeping focus on the ball-carrier having the opportunity to place, but not being able to roll around and double move. Also forcing people to show they’re holding their weight rather than going off their feet, then trying to jackal the ball.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B-iacquAgu6/

“They’re things the game already knows. It may sound boring, but if we keep focusing hard and coach that technical stuff then hopefully we get a better result.

ADVERTISEMENT

“At the moment we’re still seeing a lot people off their feet at a breakdown. That creates a whole lot of collisions where people are going from high to low. It’s not perfect, it’s just redefining what has worked for us in the past and making sure we keep good at it.”

Foster also alluded to the fact that one of the All Blacks’ star players, lock Brodie Retallick, spent considerable time on the sidelines in 2019 due to a controversial ruck entry from Springbok RG Snyman.

His injury, along with Highlanders captain James Lentjes’ earlier this year, would hopefully never occur under the new interpretations.

“We are all clear that side entry on attack is dangerous because often you’re hitting a person who’s not really prepared for what’s coming and hitting on an angle you’re vulnerable. That’s been a clear focus from the referees and we ticked that box to say ‘well done refs, keep going at it'”, said Foster.

Due to rugby across the world being suspended due to coronavirus, it may be some time before we actually see these new applications and interpretations in practice.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 1 hour ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT