Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

How do the Red Roses train in the gym and what's their physical preparation approach?

By Lucy Lomax
England's Abbie Ward lifts weights in the gym. Credit: RFU

Before joining the England Women’s set-up in autumn 2020, strength and conditioning coach Alex Martin helped prepare rugby players at London Wasps and Leicester Tigers. His role with the Red Roses is to decipher how the coach wants to play the game and help ensure that the team is best prepared to execute it.

ADVERTISEMENT

RugbyPass spoke to Martin about how he contributes to England’s style of play and why he’s favoured a different approach to traditional fitness testing.

“What we’ve tried to do is take a top-down, on-field performance approach, which is empathetic to the Head Coach’s game model,” said Martin. “We need to ensure that we’re contributing towards that so we do a lot more specific training, with a large proportion of it being performed on the field so as to promote field transfer and performance.

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

“It’s all about working back from that game model. The Red Roses have a clear way of playing the game and within that each player is challenged with executing certain actions. My job is to work out where the gaps lie in those and how they can be plugged from a physical end.

“We call it continuous, invisible testing and we use tracking technology, so whenever the players are practicing, we’re gleaning rich information on them and are consistently evaluating their performance so when we need to, we make interventions.

“We’re no longer blocking out two days to do fitness testing, which has the potential to boost the ego of someone in my seat but has limited relevance to field performance.  We need to recognise that we don’t get that many days exposure to the players, so we don’t want to waste precious time with non-informative testing. We are doing it anyway, but in a way that doesn’t disturb the rugby programme.”

“Every day of camp is themed. For example, the first day of the training week is slow in order to gain clarity. The second day is fast. On this day decision making and skill execution is overloaded by taking away time and space via fast movement velocities. The session generally comprises of both unit and team speed components, e.g. kick sprint scenarios, with GPS to help us assess the intensity of these efforts.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need players running at maximum velocity in order to take space and win the ball back as far up the field as possible, so that gives you an example of how we go about assessing them on a regular basis but in a way that is unfussy and doesn’t disturb what we’re trying to do on the field, whilst also being relevant to the game model.”

Martin continues to explain how his discipline of physical preparation not only ties in with the coaches but other areas of physical performance.

“There is a lot of cross over with physical preparation and nutrition. I might be able to achieve certain adaptations but in order to realise those, good nutrition is critical.

“Therefore, I’ll speak to the nutritionist about macronutrient intake, including the 3Ts – type, timing and total, to achieve the desired changes that we are targeting. But again, it’s all in context of how Simon (Middleton, head coach) wants to play the game, so we establish our tactics separately in our roles and then work in synergy to try and maximise those.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In the game of rugby, with so many positions and different shapes and sizes, Martin explains how he adapts training for the various different body types.

“The playing characteristics are significantly different between a prop and a winger so there will be differences. Wingers won’t need the extra mass that a front five player might need, as they’re involved in scrums and mauls and they might carry more non-functional mass to be more effective in their role of scrummaging and mauling, whereas a winger doesn’t need that non-functional mass, they need to be as lean as possible so they can take and make space, so that’s more about power to weight ratio.

“Each England player has an individual development plan (IDP) and as part of that we’ve identified three key field actions per position. They’re then rated on pressure gauges because our overarching theme to our game model is pressure with intensity so we will rate them on these pressure gauges and then we establish what the gap is and how to close it.

“It might be for example, that the impact of a player’s actions such as ball carrying, tackling, jackling, might be really effective but their frequency isn’t high enough so they’re not able to do it often enough in a game and that might be related to fatigue-resistance. Therefore, we may employ specific training to increase their repeatability.”

With the duration of this year’s tournament back up to the usual round-robin style of five matches and a fallow weekend, how does the physical performance team go about keeping the players fit and ready to perform throughout the entirety of the championship?

“When we’re in a competition block it’s all about maximising the player’s state of readiness to perform. There are two main variables: preparedness and freshness. During the first part of the Six Nations campaign we emphasised the preparedness side of the equation and when we get to the back end of the campaign we’ll focus more on freshness.

“With preparedness we might expose the players to a bit more volume which then comes at the cost of fatigue, but we’re comfortable going into certain games with a bit more fatigue and operating under those conditions, whereas when we get to the back end of the tournament, we know that we need to pull back on volume, whilst maintaining intensity.”

We’re aware of how competitive professional sports people can be, which Martin knows only too well when it comes to splitting players up in the gym environment.

“The players are generally split into forwards and backs. The main reason for that is so we can get better eyes on what they’re doing to make sure the execution is good but also to create a competitive session climate as we will get better intensity and a heightened level of performance from the players. When we feed back their results, we also present this in a head-to-head type of format to try and raise the element of competition.”

Martin explains from his experience in the men’s game, how much the men and women’s games differ when it comes to the different requirements of training.

“In the men’s game you will see more soft tissue injuries, in the form of muscle tears whereas in the women’s game it’s a lot more ligamentous injuries and that’s somewhat related to oestrogen (female sex hormone), so we utilise specific nutritional interventions to help raise tissue robustness.

“Another area of focus is the players’ menstrual cycles. When I first entered the programme, 66% of the players reported that certain parts of their menstrual cycle had a debilitating effect on their performance. As such, we are continuing to evolve our practices in the area of female athlete health.

“It involves some tweaks around nutrition and adapting peripheral training, not core training, but we’re trying to get better at understanding how the menstrual cycle can effect players in certain phases and how this impacts on their performance on an individual level.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Trevor 5 minutes ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 4 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'You lied. You're a ***king liar' - Rassie Erasmus' x-rated Bok rant 'You lied. You're a ****king liar' - Rassie Erasmus' x-rated Bok rant
Search