Northern | US

EXCLUSIVE: World Rugby respond to allegations that Tier 2 nations 'handicapped' at World Cup

Samoa team perform the Siva Tau before 2015 World Cup match with Japan. (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

World Rugby chiefs have dismissed claims smaller nations will be “handicapped” at next year’s Rugby World Cup in Japan with less recovery time between matches compared to the game’s leading countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pacific Rugby Players chief executive Dan Leo is fronting a campaign to get Tier 2 nations more representation on the World Rugby Council and remains adamant the system is fundamentally unfair despite Samoa being handed a place on the game’s ruling body.

World Rugby is sidestepping direct conflict with Leo, but it is understood they believe significant improvements to the treatment of Tier 2 countries has been instigated, making next year’s World Cup the fairest yet staged.

The counter argument from World Rugby is based on the view that the 2019 tournament has the most balanced playing schedule of any World Cup and they point to the fact that hosts Japan (20) and Tonga and Namibia( both 18) are amongst the teams with the most rest days between Pool matches.

Unlike the 2015 World Cup staged in England, no Tier 2 nation will face a Tier 1 nation after a shorter rest period. In total there will be just two periods of four rest days for Tier 2 nations compared to nine in 2015.

Continue reading below…
You may also like: The Rugby Pod talk transfer rumours

Video Spacer

Leo insists that the Repechage winner that will emerge next month from the play off between Kenya, Germany, Canada and Hong Kong will be an example of an unfair system as they will get less time to prepare for Pool B where they join New Zealand, South Africa, Italy and Namibia. However, World Rugby insist the winner will have the same 18 days to play their four Pool games as double champions South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Leo remains steadfast in his view that not enough is being done and said, “While the awarding of Samoa’s council vote would certainly be a step in the right direction and testament to the campaign, it is certainly not mission complete by any stretch of the imagination

“What the world of sport needs to focus on is that even if the Samoa news is confirmed, there could still be six tier two unions competing at the Rugby World Cup next year who have no seat on the main political body, no vote for the chairmanship and even have no representative on the game’s many committee structures.”

“As a result of this lack of political representation, there is no pushback when Rugby World Cup organisers effectively handicap these tier two countries out of the tournament by giving them a much harder schedule than the richer tier one unions who have the permanent voting majority.”

Watch: Dan Leo Life After Sport

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 34 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close