Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Ex-Chief set to join Ulster

PUKEKOHE, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 01: Stephen Donald of Counties Manukau reacts during the round seven Mitre 10 Cup match between Counties Manukau and Northland at ECOLight Stadium on October 1, 2017 in Pukekohe, New Zealand. (Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

The man set to replace Christian Lealiifano at Ulster is ex-Chief Stephen Donald, according to the Irish Independent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Early speculation had earmarked Australian pivot Matt Giteau as the replacement, but it appears the 34-year-old known as ‘Beaver’ is set to join the side on a short-term deal when Lealiifano returns to Australia at the end of the month.

Donald wasn’t offered a contract by new Chiefs coach Colin Cooper for this year’s Super Rugby competition after returning to the Chiefs last year.

He previously played in the northern hemisphere between 2011 and 2013, when he played for Bath in the Premiership but has revealed in his book that he did not particularly enjoy his time playing rugby there.

It is believed he will arrive in Belfast shortly after his Top League side, the Tokyo-based Toshiba Brave Lupus, finish up their campaign this weekend and would be in line to make his debut for Ulster when the Guinness PRO14 returns in February.

Lealiifano has been an influential figure for Ulster this season, making 15 appearances and scoring 47 points despite arriving just a week before the start of the season.

Related Coverage

Analysis: Christian Lealiifano vs Marcus Smith

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 2 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’ The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’
Search