Northern | US

Dyantyi's positive B sample result is dividing opinion


Aphiwe Dyantyi was honoured by World Rugby last year... now he faces a lengthy ban (Photo by Lee Warren/Gallo Images/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

There is a clear split in opinion among fans in the wake of Springbok Aphiwe Dyantyi testing positive for anabolic steroids.

ADVERTISEMENT

After acknowledging last Saturday that he had failed a drugs test, the 2018 World Rugby breakthrough player of the year demanded his B sample was tested.

However, instead of exonerating him, the second sample confirmed the presence of banned anabolic steroids and metabolites substances. Despite the results, that has not stopped a huge number of fans on social media leaping to the 25-year-old’s defence. 

The winger missed the entire Rugby Championship with a hamstring injury, and some have suggested that some medication he took may have caused him to fail the test. However, he failed his July 2 drugs test with a sample taken before he sustained his injury. 

Nonetheless, many feel that he still may not have knowingly taken steroids and he has rather trusted the wrong people with his health. The 13-cap Springbok has passionately refuted taking steroids – and many clearly believe him, or at least believe that he is ignorant of ever taking them. 

There have also been suggestions that this is a sabotage plot to ruin a promising player’s World Cup and his career. While this conspiracy theory has been held by a lot of people since the revelation was first announced regarding the failed drugs test, it would be very hard to prove.

Ultimately, given what Dyanyti achieved last year in the game, many fans simply do not believe that he would jeopardise his career by taking such a huge risk. This is what has been said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/masteredsauce/status/1167355443762610176?s=20

https://twitter.com/Murrayingram/status/1167354269852426240?s=20

On the other hand, there are those on Twitter that are not as sympathetic with the player. The primary reason is that it seems strange a player could take three banned substances without knowing. 

With regards to the alleged attempts to sabotage his World Cup, it has been highlighted that Rassie Erasmus had already made it clear that Dyantyi was unlikely to make the World Cup, meaning there was not necessarily anything to the suggested sabotage. This is what has been said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/Zondi_Elihle/status/1167360112207585281?s=20

https://twitter.com/thewolfladyy/status/1167358538609496064?s=20

https://twitter.com/Sithe_daGTi/status/1167366749404246016?s=20

While there is a split in opinion, the majority of fans seem to feel that Dyantyi would not have knowingly taken steroids. 

If the Lions winger still pleads his innocence, there will be a hearing in four weeks where he will need to provide evidence. But if he is found guilty, he could face a minimum of four years out of the game, which would send shockwaves through the rugby world. 

WATCH: South Africa’s media conference prior to their departure on Friday to the World Cup in Japan

Video Spacer

 

Stream Nations Championship 2026 LIVE

Hemispheres collide in the new Nations Championship. Stream live, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV.

Watch on RPTV
Starts 4th July 2026 - USA only.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close