Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

De Allende: Rugby has changed 'immensely' since 2015

By Ian Cameron
Damien de Allende tussles with New Zealand players

It’s only been four years, but Damien de Allende says rugby has changed immensely since the 2015 edition of the Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

De Allende was speaking at a media conference at the Nadahama Sports Ground in Kobe.

Comments from the South Africa inside-centre shed light on the on-field changes – at least how de Allende sees them.

“Not just me or South Africa, but the whole of world rugby has improved immensely,” said de Allende. “Sometimes Handre (Pollard) and myself watch old World Cup games from 2015, and back then there was absolutely no line speed on defence. And the skillset wasn’t under pressure or anything like that.

“We’ve all developed in that sense, where we can play under kind of pressure – where guys are in your face and making decisions under pressure.

Video Spacer

“The game has gone a bit more structured as well. I think that’s where you’ve got to learn and accept that you are not going to get a lot more turnovers, and there are going to be a lot more kicks on you.

“So, it’s a lot more structured attack, and that’s where we have developed.”

“We all have the licence to express ourselves on the field, but sometimes it’s quite tough – with the line-speed and the way teams have developed now with their skillsets under pressure.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sometimes it’s quite tough to make a 50-50 pass, because you know that if that pass doesn’t stick, you will probably concede seven, five or three points.

“You want to take a few risks now and then, if you really have to. If the opportunity is there and you feel like you can do it, then do it.

“But I would say if you are in two minds and there’s a bit of doubt, then rather tuck it and try to play one or more phases, and see if you can break the defence and get over the advantage line.”

The Stormers centre was quizzed on how being in the 2019 quarter-finals is different to reaching the 2015 semi-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a bit similar. The only thing we did differently in the 2015 World Cup is that we managed to get two points from losing the first game, and knew if we could win the other pool matches, we would qualify from the pool stage.

“This time, we were under a lot more pressure – and I don’t mean that in a negative way. We knew we had to win at least three of our games with a bonus point, and that is where the pressure came on us a bit.

“Luckily we exceeded those expectations. Our best game yet has been against Italy. Although we were under a lot of pressure, to get the bonus-point try and keep them tryless was really massive, because they played good rugby against Namibia and Canada.”

Dallen Stanford is a South African born former seven’s player turned broadcaster. RugbyPass caught up with him in Japan to discuss his journey and his predictions for the 2019 Rugby World Cup.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 14 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Israel Dagg blasts Crusaders, weighs in on Rob Penney's future Dagg blasts Crusaders, debates Penney's future
Search