Northern | US

Oscar Jégou could face the same fate as Eben Etzebeth after ugly incident

France flanker Oscar Jegou has been cited for an alleged eye gouge. Photo: BBC

France back-row forward Oscar Jégou will appear on Tuesday, March 10, before an independent disciplinary commission after being cited for an act of unfair play that many interpreted as a gouge, during Saturday’s helter-skelter match between Scotland and France in the Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the citation report, the 22-year-old has been cited for an act of “foul play” contrary to Rule 9.12 of World Rugby, which prohibits any form of physical or verbal abuse: “a player must not physically or verbally assault anyone. Physical aggression includes in particular, but not exclusively, biting, punching, making contact with the eye, the eyes or the eye area, striking with any part of the arm, the shoulder, the head or the knees, trampling, crouching or kicking.”

During a Scotland maul close to the French try line, Jégou placed his right hand on the face of the Scotland’s replacement hooker, Ewan Ashman. The close-up images seem to show his fingers coming into contact with the eye area, an action prohibited and widely condemned as one of the lowest acts on a rugby field.

VIDEO

This incident, which occurred before the try scored by Darcy Graham in the 59th minute, was not examined by the referee Angus Gardner nor mentioned in the post-match press conference.

The player’s case will be heard by video conference by an independent disciplinary commission composed of Simon Thomas (chairman), Christopher Morgan and John Langford. This hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, March 10, 2026, at 9:30am. (GMT).

The citation exposes the player to the scale of sanctions provided for contact with the eyes, ranging, in the case of an intentional gesture, from a 12 to 208-week ban, depending on the severity, and, in the case of an unintentional act of foul play, from 6 to 208 weeks, there are again divided into three levels of danger.

Eben Etzebeth was suspended for 12 weeks when he was found guilty of eye gouging during the Springboks’ match against Wales last November, the gesture having been judged intentional, but with mitigating circumstances.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Create your ticketing account and unlock presale access for Rugby World Cup 2027 now

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
H
HT 34 days ago

It was a quite deliberate act of violence in a game that is hard enough. It’s bad enough, but if you roll the video on a bit he goes in for a second go, targetting Ashman’s eye. This wasn’t the result of a dust up and frayed tempers as the Etzebeth incident was. It was a clear and cowardly attempt by Jégou to harm a fellow player in the course of a legal play.

I’d treat it even more severly and ban him for at least a season.

G
GrandDisse 34 days ago

One of the rare french player up to his level this saturday.

Don’t see how he could get away from that facial massage though.

T
Timmyboy 35 days ago

How French !!

S
SB 35 days ago

Very interested to see what the punishment for this will be in comparison to Etzebeth.

F
FB 34 days ago

Considering it was Etzebeth’s only red card in 141 games for the Springboks he had a good record up to that point. I do not think it should exceed 12 weeks based on the act.


But Oscar Jégou has a doping charge against him from 2023. Although not related it is however a considered an offence. He tested positive for benzoylecgonine following a Top 14 match against Montpellier on August 20, 2023. Although initially facing a potential multi-year ban for a doping violation, the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) sanctioned him with a one-month suspension. The ban was reduced from a higher initial, likely three-month, penalty because Jégou admitted to the mistake and participated in a rehabilitation/awareness program.


I do not claim to know the process but there is a chance it could count against him from what I have read.

J
John Breslin 35 days ago

I think he'll follow Eben's example and say it was unintentional, to get a lower sanction


If he admits it then I reckon it would be a statement ban

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT