Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

David Pocock calls out Israel Folau on latest captaincy claims

By Online Editors
Israel Folau. (Photo by Jono Searle/Getty Images)

Former Wallabies loose forward David Pocock has weighed in on the latest development in the Israel Folau saga.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ex-Wallabies fullback is awaiting a legal fight with Rugby Australia over what he believes to be a wrongful termination of his multi-million dollar contract as a result of an Instagram post in April where he said “hell awaits” for gay people.

Earlier this week, Folau increased his compensation demands from $10 million to $14 million, claiming that he will now miss out on extra earnings that come with being captain of the Australian national side.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Pocock, who has previously condemned Folau for his homophobic comments, told Fox Sports News that he didn’t understand why Folau believes that he would have ousted incumbent Wallabies skipper Michael Hooper.

“I think Michael Hooper has been doing a great job and he’s contracted to the next World Cup so I’m not sure where Izzy’s getting that from,” he said on Friday.

Pocock’s comments come after former Wallaby Peter FitzSimons brandished Folau’s captaincy claims as “absurd”, especially given that he was never named vice-captain.

“It just gets ever more absurd,” FitzSimons told TVNZ. “From a distance, I just thought, ‘What? Captain?’ … but Michael Cheika, who was the Wallabies coach of course, he moved through seven vice-captains.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Now, if Michael Cheika had seven vice-captains and Israel Folau wasn’t one of them, I think by definition he was a very unlikely man to be captain.

“The last time Australian rugby had a fullback as captain was in 1980. It was Paul McLean, it was one Test, and after that the theory in Australian rugby was that fullback was too far from the main game to be the captain, so the tradition in Australian rugby is we don’t have a fullback as a captain.

“I find the claim absolutely absurd.”

Pocock went on to criticise Folau for using his profile to drag the sport of rugby through the mud by discriminating against gay people.

ADVERTISEMENT

“My view has been that sport is at its best when it’s challenging society to be more inclusive,” Pocock said.

“I think we can play such an important role in trying to instil values of fairness and inclusivity into kids coming through.

“I found it incredibly disappointing the way he’s used his platform around this.”

The Daily Telegraph reported on Friday that two unnamed former Wallabies who have signed affidavits supporting Folau’s legal case are no longer employees of RA.

It is understood that their statements will suggest that Folau’s reintroduction into the national side following his anti-gay comments would not have a negative impact on team cohesion.

Folau claims that his contract termination will cost him $4.2 million between 2019 and 2022, as well as $300,000 in match payments between 2019 and 2021, and an additional $150,000 in match payments for 2022.

Furthermore, the 30-year-old believes he would have earned up to $1.5 million per season for one or two years with Rugby Australia and a Super Rugby club following 2022.

He also believes that he would have made up to $1.5 million per year over a two-to-three year period had he chosen to play overseas after his international career ended.

Estimates established over lost dollars from sponsors, World Cup appearances and captaincy fees are also included to justify the enhanced $14 million demand by the triple-code star.

The claim also includes estimates of between $450,000 and $1.25 million per year lost in “post-playing career monetary benefits” over a span of 15 to 25 years.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity
Search