Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Date set for 'the biggest decision in the history of professional rugby in England'

By Chris Jones
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

English rugby chiefs will be asked to support controversial plans for a 13 team Gallagher Premiership with an end to automatic relegation when they meet on September 13.

ADVERTISEMENT

The proposal will go before the Rugby Football Union Council meeting that day and has been described by Damian Hopley, chief executive to the Rugby Players Association – which represents England’s professional players – as “the biggest decision in the history of professional rugby in England.”

The RFU Council will be presented with a plan, agreed by the Union’s professional game board, which represents the 12 Gallagher Premiership clubs, RFU and players’ union, that would mean no relegation at the end of the 2019-20 season with one team – most likely Newcastle – promoted from the Championship.

With no automatic relegation in the new regulations, the RFU would go back to the previously used system for their top flight with a play-off between the bottom club and the top team in the Championship with the victor over two legs winning Premiership status. That deals with fears the Premiership would be ring-fenced.

Video Spacer

The most recent meeting of the Professional Game Board rubber-stamped the proposal and now it will be up to the Council to back the move. Hopley believes the proposal deals with many of the key issues, including the ability of Premiership clubs to invest in major infrastructure plans with more certainty about their place in the top flight. The arrival of private equity firm CVC, who paid more than £200m to become minority stakeholders in the professional club game in England, has changed the financial landscape and ending automatic relegation is seen as a vital move.

Hopley said: “This is the biggest decision to be made in the professional era in England and we have a very good relationship with the RFU and the clubs.

“There are ongoing discussions with the RFU, Clubs and the Championship and the decision will be with the RFU Council on September 13. The plan is for no relegation in the 19/20 season and going forward it would be a 13 team Premiership with a two-legged play-off between the bottom club and the top team in the Championship. In the 20 plus years of professional rugby, the sport hasn’t been too clever at joined-up thinking and this is the first time we have all the stakeholders aligned. While there is devil in the detail, we want to find a solution that produces viability at Premiership and Championships levels and gives players guaranteed game time.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We want to make sure the players are protected within that new structure and with CVC coming in there is lot of excitement about where the game could go. I hope the Council understands that is a very important part of the evolution of the game in England.”

While a 13 team Gallagher Premiership is on the cards, Hopley does not expect to the abandoned World Rugby plan for a Nations Championship to unite the Hemispheres to be revived unless the players are fully integrated into the process.

He added: “I don’t see anything that is imminent to replace the World Rugby plan that failed to get enough backing. What we have seen with the demise of the idea is that you cannot just ignore the opinions of the players and ask them to just toe the line. That is at best a 20th Century attitude and at worst 19th Century. We didn’t understand how it got to the stage it reached without due process and the press release the International Rugby Players put out quoting leading players highlight this. Players from around the World who wanted to know how we had got to a point where player welfare was so far down the list.

“The fact is that the idea is dead in the water unless the players are part of the process. It is as simple as that.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 4 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 11 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search