Northern | US

Clive Woodward outlines his fears for England


Owen Farrell and (right) Sir Clive Woodward
Comments
Comment

Sir Clive Woodward fears England’s indiscipline could deny them Rugby World Cup glory in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward believes England have a “real chance” of emulating the side he led to World Cup success in 2003, but has concerns over their ability to keep 15 players on the pitch.

“There’s many strengths, they’ve got this very powerful team,” Woodward said of an England team who play their tournament opener against Tonga next Sunday.

“This is what I call an x-factor team. But quite a few of the starting XV have got a track record of losing it in a game when under pressure.

“There’s been a lot of focus on the rules regarding neck-high tackles, and if you’re playing (pool rivals) France and Argentina, top teams, and get a guy sent off then the chance of winning that game is going to be very difficult.

“We saw recently (Scott) Barrett get sent off for New Zealand v Australia and they had a record score against them.

“You need every single player to play under pressure and play within the laws of the game.

“That’s the only chink I see (with England), they’ve got a real chance if they can play in the right way and keep 15 players on the pitch.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward believes Australian Jones has done an excellent job since being appointed after England’s failure to make the knockout stages at the 2015 World Cup.

He told BBC Radio: “Eddie came into the job thinking English rugby is tough and combustible, as he’s called it.

“He’s built an England team around how he saw England playing in the past. They are tough and very aggressive, the key thing to me is they’ve got to play quick.

“It doesn’t matter how tough and physical you are, if you play slowly you are not going to win. If they can play at a real pace they have got every chance.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward expects England to make the final in Yokohama on November 2 but concedes they will have to do it “the hard way”.

On their main rivals, he said: “South Africa have come together well, it’s the first time they’ve selected their best players from all around the world so they’ve got a very strong team.

“New Zealand are not quite the scary team they were four years ago, but I still think they’re going to be the team to beat.

“Whoever wins that (pool) game between South Africa and New Zealand will play England in the semi-final if they go well.

“England will have to do it the hard way to win it, as they will play Australia or Wales in the quarter-final.

“But I think an England-South Africa final will be fantastic.”

JONES AND FARRELL PROVIDE UPDATE FROM MIYAZAKI

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close