Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

George Ford targeted for sensational code switch - reports

England flyhalf George Ford. (Photo by Lynne Cameron/Getty Images)

George Ford is being lined up by several Rugby League clubs as they seek to poach one of union’s leading stars.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Leicester Tigers outhalf has lost his starting spot with England, with Owen Farrell now the preferred option at 10, with Ford having to settle for a place on the bench.

Ford didn’t feature in the recent 21-13 defeat against Wales, with Eddie Jones opting against throwing him into the mix as England chased the game.

It appears that the 10-12 Ford-Farrell axis is now a thing of the past, particularly with Manu Tuilagi back to fitness and Henry Slade’s form at 13.

The Rugby Paper report that Leeds Rhinos, St Helens and Wigan Warriors are keeping an eye on the Ford situation.

Rugby League runs in the family, his dad Mike Ford had a long career in Rugby League, playing for the likes of Wigan, Oldham, Castleford and Warrington Wolves, among others.

But George has spent his entire career in union, beginning at Leicester Tigers before switching to Bath when his dad Mike moved there as Director of Rugby, before switching back to Welford Road for the 2017/18 season, signing a three-year contract.

ADVERTISEMENT

He represented England at U16, U18, U19 and U20 level and played for the U18’s aged just 15. The 25-year-old made his senior debut in 2014 and now has 53 caps to his name, only behind Jonny Wilkinson and Rob Andrew when it comes to appearances for England in the 10 jersey.

Only last month Luther Burrell confirmed his switch to league. The 31-year-old former England centre is leaving Northampton Saints at the end of the season and will be joining Super League side Warrington Wolves.

The 31-year-old has agreed a two-year deal with Warrington and said of his switch: “I know I will need to earn the trust of my team-mates first and foremost. I also hope to bring some physicality, that edge and the ability to break the line.

“I’ve had the opportunity to play for England in union and to play on some of the biggest stages in finals. I’d like to think I can transfer the experience I have gained into rugby league.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m not here to make up the numbers. I’m coming over and I mean business.”

Watch: Rugby Explorer – South Africa

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

22 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII
Search