Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Ex-Toulon player Barba 'never felt so free' despite being due in court over casino incident

Ben Barba playing for St Helens (Photo by Jan Kruger/Getty Images)

Former Toulon player Ben Barba says he has “never felt so free” as he faces two public nuisance charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 29-year-old faced Townsville Magistrates Court on Friday where his lawyer requested the case be transferred to Mackay on April 16 for a plea date, with Barba expected to plead guilty.

Barba’s lawyer, Campbell MacCallum, said the adjournment would give his client enough time to gather material for sentencing submissions next month.

Walking from court, Barba said he had left playing in the NRL behind him and was looking forward to getting on with his life in central Queensland.

“I’ve obviously copped what I’ve got,” Barba told media as he walked from court on Friday.

“The only way I can do now is move forward and get on with my life and obviously be a regular human being and enjoy my job.”

“As I’ve said, as bad as the situation is, I’ve never felt so free that I can sort of get on with my life without the pressure of footy.”

He suggested he was on good terms with his partner and explained he lost his temper at a television reporter when he was filmed yelling “I will hurt you” last week because he was protective of his children.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I try to keep them (his children) away from it (attention) as much as possible. I lost my cool there a couple of days ago when people were following me around,” Barba said.

“I’ll do anything for my kids, so I probably acted in the wrong way, but that’s the lengths I’ll go to to protect my children.”

Barba was charged with two counts of public nuisance following an incident at a Townsville casino on the Australia Day weekend.

He was sacked by the North Queensland Cowboys in February without playing a game for the club over allegations he was violent towards his partner Ainslie Currie. He was later deregistered by the NRL.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2012 Dally M medallist was charged a day after telling a televi sion news crew he had “lost everything” and was getting ready to hand himself in to police over the allegations.

He reportedly will not face domestic violence-related charges because Ms Currie had not made a complaint to police.

Barba had been offered a lifeline to return to the NRL with the Cowboys after stints with French rugby union and the English Super League.

The NRL gave Barba a lifetime ban after viewing CCTV footage of the incident outside the casino.

AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 1 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

14 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII Michael Cheika intéressé pour revenir au XIII
Search