For the final 15 minutes at Aviva Stadium on Saturday night, Ireland broke the scrummaging siege and desperately tried to punch back. At 24-13 behind, and still a man down (Paddy McCarthy sin-binned), this was a cornered animal trying to spit and claw its way out. Not for the first time, South Africa had an answer.
Knowing how utterly dominant their scrum was, the Springboks sent five towering kicks towards, and into, the Irish 22 in the space of four minutes. The aerial bombardment was designed to pin Ireland back near their tryline. Four of the five kicks were contestable. The South African chasers had no real intention of catching the balls – they were mainly hoping to force handling errors that would lead to more scrums.
On the one occasion that Cheslin Kolbe competed in the air for an up-and-under, he knocked on. That did not matter, either. It would be another scrum, unless Ireland used their advantage well. They did not. Sam Prendergast sought to find touch but left his kick short and found only Mannie Libbok. He knew the brief. Up went another soaring kick. Garry Ringrose swatted the ball back, under pressure from Grant Williams, but Ireland were back in their 22.

Ireland almost broke free, up the left, but Kolbe jumped to block a James Lowe chip. Jack Crowley had to turn on the after-burners to get back, clean up, and zoom out of trouble. Play spread left and Ringrose beamed a kick past the halfway line. Damian Willemse gathered and shoved it right back down Ireland’s throats. Jamison Gibson-Park, again under pressure, slapped the ball back. Canan Moodie was in hot pursuit and beat Prendergast to the ball, kicked on and was only just denied an excellent score by the diving, scrambling Crowley.
Somehow, at the end of another manic, five-minute stretch, Ireland remained 24-13 behind. It would be another minute and 40 seconds before they were restored to 15 men.
The miracle in Dublin was that Ireland were still in this most one-sided of fights, heading into the final moments. Rónan Kelleher took a quick-tap penalty, five metres out from the Springboks’ tryline, with 77:20 on the clock. Had Ireland manufactured a try, they would still have been in with a chance of victory. Andy Farrell’s side huffed and puffed but, ultimately, got stuffed.
The foundation of South Africa’s win was built around their fearsome, remorseless pack…a baker’s dozen of granite grafters that ground Ireland to dust, then stamped on the dust.
Ireland started the second half with only 12 men, yet out-scored South Africa 6-5 in that period. All they finished with were moral victories as Farrell declared himself “unbelievably proud” of the fight shown by his men. The Irish crowd that flooded out of the stadium and down Lansdowne Road were left to complain about refereeing calls and non-calls, ask when Joe McCarthy would be back and worry about Andrew Porter and the Irish scrum.
The foundation of South Africa’s win was built around their fearsome, remorseless pack. With 72 minutes played, a graphic flashed up of the game’s four leading contenders for Man of the Match. Two were backs. If there was any justice, they would have filled the screen and stretched the graphic to 13 – the starting pack, Wilco Louw, Gerhard Steenkamp, RG Snyman, Kwagga Smith and André Esterhuizen. A baker’s dozen of granite grafters that ground Ireland to dust, then stamped on the dust.
Mike Ross can empathise with the Irish front rows that started and finished that set-piece shellacking by South Africa. Ross faced the Boks on four occasions in his 61-cap Ireland career, winning and losing two apiece.

“My last game for Ireland was against South Africa,” he recalls. “I was up against ‘Beast’, Tendai Mtawarira. I was trying everything that I could but his power was such that when he just turned it on, I was being put to the pin of my collar just to survive.”
Several of the South African backs – Willemse, Libbok and Damian de Allende in particular – were quite demonstrative and in the faces of Irish players, and fans, during Saturday’s 24-13 win. It was noticeable, though, how the Springbok forwards were not jawing or celebrating when turning the scrummaging screw on their opponents.
“Yeah,” Ross agrees. “Their forwards are not really like that. Beast definitely wasn’t. He just got about his job. Some of the English teams, I used to find, would let you know all about it, if they were on top. South Africans tend to just get about it, and are quite polite and respectful, after. You can share a beer with them.”
By the time the penalty try happened, and Andrew Porter was off, the weight difference was nearly 150 kilos. It just compounds, pressure after pressure.
Following South Africa’s win, their first in Dublin since 2012, I was in touch with one of the Springbok forwards, noting their set-piece supremacy and sending on my congratulations. Thanking me, he added, ‘Scrums was nice, at least for us!’
Ross was at the game, but went back over the full match on Monday to get a clearer idea of how South Africa had bossed the scrums. There were 16 scrums in total (not including resets) and 12 were Springbok put-ins. From that dozen, they won eight penalties, sent Porter and Paddy McCarthy to the sin-bin and claimed a penalty try.
“The main difference was the Ireland pack’s weight,” Ross explains. “With James Ryan in it, was 916kgs, give or take a kilo or two. South Africa were 948kgs, over a 30-kilo difference there. Significant. When we get into the black period, when Ryan was sent off (and Bundee Aki filled in), it was down to 902kgs. Nearly a 50-kilo weight difference. By the time the penalty try happened, and Andrew Porter was off, the weight difference was nearly 150 kilos. It just compounds, pressure after pressure.

“Most of the damage was done, as far as I can see, by Thomas du Toit or Wilco Louw after him, getting into the joint between the hooker and loosehead – so, Dan Sheehan and Porter – and Malcolm Marx was also doing damage there. They were almost isolating that joint, and once you break that, you break the scrum.”
“A lot of the time,” Ross continues, “the South African props were hard on the angle, too. Personally, I’d be delighted to see an Irish prop going in at that angle and being rewarded. It’s great if you can get away with it, you know? On a couple of occasions, it was very clear and obvious that they were driving up and out to the left. If you look at it, it’s right there. But they were winning the engagement, which makes it easier to go forward and paints a good picture to the ref. If you are refereeing to the letter of the law, you reverse one or two of those (calls). It got into that snowball effect – giving up penalties, so you’re losing props and giving up more men. It was not going to get any better.”
The more I looked at it, the more I was impressed by Marx. He is a scrummaging beast.
There was one moment, just after Tommy O’Brien had been replaced by Crowley, when Tadhg Furlong felt Ireland should have won a scrum penalty near the Irish line. It was a photo finish, though, to see what hooker popped up first, and referee Matthew Carley safely opted for a reset. That was as good as it would get for Ireland – a nearly penalty. “The more I looked at it,” says Ross, “the more I was impressed by Marx. He is a scrummaging beast.”
“Without Joe McCarthy,” he adds, “Ireland are without an out-and-out tighthead lock. The other best scrummaging lock, James Ryan, was sent off. We were left with, essentially, two lineout locks, Tadhg Beirne and Ryan Baird, who both cover six. No disrespect to them, but if you could pick a prime pack for scrummaging, they wouldn’t be the second-row pairing you’d choose.”

There had been surprise, in some quarters, that the ballast and experience of Iain Henderson was not selected on the Ireland bench. Instead, Farrell went for Cian Prendergast, more of a back-row that moonlights at lock. The coach was in a damned-if-you-do situation here, though, as he needs to blood younger players with an eye towards the next World Cup. “It was almost a perfect storm,” Ross reasons. “From a South African perspective, they did exactly the right thing. If you have your foot on someone’s throat, you keep it there. If your opponent is hurting, keep doing what’s working. I was actually amazed that we did not lose by more. A lot of credit must go to the Irish lads for knuckling down, with 12 and 13 men, and battling.”
Much of the focus, in the aftermath of a second tough November loss, will be on Porter, who was penalised four times and sent to the sin-bin. Teaming up with Marx, Du Toit and Louw gave the Leinster loosehead a working over. That defeat will be the lowest Porter has felt since Wayne Barnes found fault with his scrummaging during the 2023 World Cup quarter-final loss to New Zealand.
If you were designing your perfect prop, and put all your points into scrummaging, that’s what you’d get with Wilco Louw.
“I stood up for Andrew at the time,” says Ross, “because he wasn’t rewarded for dominance, even though it wasn’t always legal. On Saturday, South Africa were rewarded for dominance when they were not always legal. If you want to encourage that kind of thing, well, reward it.
“Andrew was up against two massive props that are about 135 kilos each. If you were designing your perfect prop, and put all your points into scrummaging, that’s what you’d get with Wilco Louw. Then they have some proper monsters in the second row – Eben Etzebeth is one of the best out there, and you have RG Snyman coming on. By the end of the match, the South Africa pack was 963kgs and Ireland were 887.”

“It’s worth noting that Ireland handled the South African pack well, before,” the retired tighthead adds. “We didn’t get dished up by the French scrum or English scrum. The Irish scrum hasn’t been that bad. Some days it goes against you. You are off by a few per cent and it all builds. That will hopefully serve as a reminder that there is work that needs to be done.”
There has been a lot of talk, since Saturday, on the national airwaves about depowering the scrum. Off The Ball discussed straighter scrum-half feeds, so the hooker should have to hook the ball back, while Today FM suggested that teams should not be allowed to request a scrum when awarded a penalty. “Be careful what you wish for,” warns Ross.
“If you think back a few years, Leinster were playing La Rochelle and Uini Atonio was on. Big man, brilliant scrummager. Who did they target to score a try against? Garry Ringrose ran around him for a score. If you take the big bodies out, to try and depower the scrum, you then don’t have guys for the likes of Cheslin Kolbe to run around. You also go away from what makes rugby great – it’s a game for all shapes and sizes.
“You can’t have one team with a really good scrum and try to legislate them out of it. How about you guys just get a bit better?”
Rassie is inside their heads. Ox, wilco and marx will pulverise most front-rowers because its for the country and not a paycheck. We are the only team with only SA-born players. Scrumming is 50% mindset. You can be how technical. In the 1980s we wanted to play our white countrymen but we couldn't. We were lighter and shorter but we had heart and that's what the springboks have. Look at the talent we've unearthed. Plan all you want. The Springboks are here to make an indelible mark on the rugby world. Only NZ will be able to match us in heart. Jake stop telling them how to beat us. Rassie can read as well. You're just going to worsen their agony
Although the South African forwards don’t always cheer when they win a penalty (they certainly sometimes do), they are not particularly humble, as Ross suggests. They instead prefer to make remarks in podcasts and documentaries and write posts on social media insulting their opponents even after winning against them. That’s not humility or respect. Don’t get me started on the level of abuse that is put out there by the SA fans. I guess having a coach like Rassie who thrives off petty unsporting behaviour, it is to be expected!
Moving on - I think the scrum is a great part of the game and full credit to SA for being the most dominant side at that. I have always felt it is a shame that penalties result so easily from scrums though, so would like WR to look at whether or not they can allow a more natural outcome without the need for cards. Preferring free kicks possibly, or a rule around the number of cards that can be issued.
‘They instead prefer to make remarks in podcasts and documentaries and write posts on social media insulting their opponents…’
Can you offer evidence to support this claim: player names and links to their comments? Because, without supporting evidence, it’s not a statement of fact but the opinion of a fan - who is not showing a great deal of humility and respect.
About the Bok fans: perhaps you can explain why it’s OK when we’re subjected to the worst forms of online abuse (often not even related to rugby), but when we return the favour, then we’re expected to be humble and respectful and everybody is hurt and offended. Is it never an option to show us some respect?
Another WR campaign then, there’s been a few on here. Good luck with that and let us all know it goes…
Always going on about the weight when the Boks are usually always lighter than the French pack
Figures seem a bit off too :
Starting Bok pack = 930kg (he claims 948kg)
Ending Bok pack = 946kg (he claims 963kg)
Mike Ross is a stats nerd. I’d say his garden shed is a bit like Charlie Day’s ‘Pepe Silvia’ conspiracy board!
The metrics will vary a little depending on what data is used - club or national player profiles.
The Opta stats had the starting pack weights at 957 kilos v 907 kilos but is likely a rounded figure as I doubt they would be exactly 50 kilos heavier.
The same stats had the SA starting pack 9 kilos lighter in the French game.
Scrums aside - Bok D was awesome to watch - super dominant - Irish carriers stopped and knocked backwards. Bokke had a point to prove, scrums were just one part of it.
I think we exposed Ireland in the scrum, hugely. Their next problem will be the opening 6 Nation game. Can’t wait for it, my money’s on Le Bleu.
As a passionate rugby and 6 nation supporter, I have always loved Ireland, but the negative play, camping off side and dirty tricks on Saturday, not so much anymore.
I don’t agree that the initial small weight difference was the difference. It's the technique, and the passion to crunch the opposition.
“I have always loved Ireland, but the negative play, camping off side and dirty tricks on Saturday, not so much anymore.”
I would be interested to hear what you refer to here, G. Negative play ? Camping offside ? The “dirty tricks” ?
“Their next problem will be the opening 6 Nation game.” Why so G ? They will not be facing the Bok pack !!
Nice article this.
Teams have been playing to set up set pieces forever. Lineouts in the corner. Over and over again, mauling until the try comes.
Why should the scrum be any different as a tactic to get an advantage over the competition.
Lastly, the scrum is what makes rugby unique. Depower them, reduce them, legislate them to death and you destroy something special.
Ross describes SA tactics as breaking the joint between Porter and the Hooker. That gets an instant penalty. This is the problem. Teams are not trying to win possession and play. They are trying to win penalties and yellow cards. We saw that even against inferior numbers with the ball in open play SA were playing for scrums. This isn’t what makes rugby unique. This usage of scrums to milk yellows is something new and, from the public’s view, unwelcome.
“Willemse, Libbok and Damian de Allende” Show boating.
Not a fan of this. Don’t think trying to antagonise supporters will endear SA to anyone. This isn’t soccer.
Hallelujah. Hallelujah. Halleluuuuuuu…..jaaaaaaaah
Yeah, well said by Mike.
As tough as it was for Irish fans to watch, they were simply outpowered and the matter got worse when Ryan was red-carded. South Africa choked them out.
Quote of the year!
Fair play that must have been painful to dissect the way Ireland were destroyed like that. They hardly got out of their own half in the second 40 and the stats show they just couldn’t compete.
Good to see you avoided jumping on the one man (multiple faces…) bandwagon elsewhere on rp now campaigning to change the scrum laws. Then again that will go about as far as their previous campaign on bench composition…
Ireland actually won a few of those scrums as Mike Ross said. Perfect Storm, a complete anomaly and yet Ireland made it a live match up until the final whistle.
Ireland played poorly in the limited possession. Tommy O’Brien kicked into touch from a turnover leading to the SA pen try. He keeps that in field, there is no-one at home and Ireland go in at the break only 5 points down.
France also were very undercooked against SA (as they can be in November). They are not far off. I wouldn’t write your name on that cup yet. If they get drawn in Pool E/F then maybe start writing the name on it.
The challenge I see coming for teams is that they will invariably have to spend much more time on scrums going forward. Which will suck attention and effort away from other set pieces/areas of the forward game in preparation.
And I don’t see any other teams LOVING scrums as much as they do - barring perhaps Argentina.
One has to applaud the Boks coaching and management team for working so hard to get their structures and systems to this point. The Boks are making marginal gains around all their set pieces for 7 years, and other teams just haven’t got the time to catch them.
Wales by 3 points because of an unfortunate scrum over a wet soggy sheep pat.
Great article. The Springboks sure paint the right pictures for the ref. They work so hard on their scrum so deserve their success. The scrum is a sacred rugby union set piece the likes of which exists in no other sport. Its 8 men shoving against 8. Ireland as you say need to get better at it. If you take scrums away you may as well call it league.
Couldn’t agree more, Hands off to our scrums!
The Boks also bribe/coerce the refs, remember? While juicing and being arrogant.