Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

LONG READ 'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'

'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'
4 days ago

Jonny Wilkinson was an exception in many ways, not of least of which was his popularity in France. They loved him. When he bowed out of rugby, by steering Toulon to the Top 14 title in 2014, a packed Stade de France broke into a rendition of God Save the Queen.

But Jonny was the exception. The French are happiest when the English live up to their stereotype: arrogant, contemptuous, provocative. Brian Moore, Will Carling, Wade Dooley, Martin Johnson, Josh Lewsey, Matt Dawson, James Haskell, Dylan Hartley and Owen Farrell, to name but a few of France’s least favourite Englishmen.

To that list may soon be added the name of Henry Pollock, described by the Times last year as a ‘wind-up merchant’ par excellence. The Northampton flanker did that to the French TV commentary team who watched the Saints dispose of Castres in last month’s Champions Cup quarter-final. As Pollock showboated to the crowd after scoring a try, one of the commentators sighed and muttered that this kid was good, but also irritating.

Henry Pollock
Henry Pollock’s exuberance and raw talent have seen him gaining headlines all over the world of rugby (Photo David Fitzgerald/Getty Images)

In recent weeks Pollock has received rave reviews in L’Equipe and Midi Olympique, the two newspapers both describing the 20-year-old as a ‘phenomenon’. Midi Olympique devoted the whole of its back page to Pollock last week, and in its introduction called him ‘brave, aggressive, skilful, talkative and provocative’.

The paper was waxing ever more lyrically after Pollock’s performance against Leinster. He is Northampton’s ‘X-factor’, an ‘extraordinary’ athlete who if he plays against Bordeaux in the final the way he did in the semis, will pose some serious problems to the French side.

The French rugby press has a tendency to put one player of his generation on a pedestal. Sometimes it’s deserved, as with Serge Blanco and Antoine Dupont, and sometimes it’s not, as was the case with the adulation heaped on Frederic Michalak and Sébastien Chabal.

The British media have also been guilty in the past of singling out players for ‘star treatment’. Wilkinson, Gavin Henson and Danny Cipriani spring to mind. Of the trio, only Wilko lived up to the hype.

The British media have also been guilty in the past of singling out players for ‘star treatment’. Wilkinson, Gavin Henson and Danny Cipriani spring to mind. Of the trio, only Wilko lived up to the hype. Henson and Cipriani became fodder for the tabloids because of their off-field antics.

Take heed, Henry Pollock. Will he be the next Jonny or the next Danny? His gregarious character couldn’t be more different to the introverted Wilkinson’s, old Mr Poker Face, who rarely revealed any emotion on the rugby field. Nor did he rack up any enemies. He was universally respected.

Jonny Wilkinson
Jonny Wilkinson hit early stardom but his introverted personality dampened the clamour for the celebrity lifestyle (Photo GLYN KIRK/Getty Images)

Pollock has already “put a target on his own back”, according to former Ireland and Leinster full-back Rob Kearney. “Maybe that’s what he enjoys – it’s the manner in which he gets himself up for games. Characters like that are far and few between.”

Despite the brash persona, Pollock is a savvy and balanced young man. He is studying for a Sports Management degree at Loughborough University and he has a wisdom beyond his tender years.  He knows he is playing the pantomime villain. “Being annoying is part of my game,” he told the BBC recently. “We need more characters, more players the fans want to come and watch. If you look to the football world, fans very much have their players and the personalities they like.”

Rugby is conservative by nature and it has a tendency to distrust ‘characters’. It prefers conformity.

Pollock is right. Rugby is conservative by nature and it has a tendency to distrust ‘characters’. It prefers conformity. Remember all the fuss with Chris Ashton and his exuberance when touching down tries. “I long for the day clown Chris Ashton injures himself in the idiotic ‘Ash splash’ act of scoring,” wrote the former Ireland fly-half turned journalist Tony Ward. “Every time he makes that ugly dive the rest of the watching world…dislikes English rugby that little bit more.”

Another player tarnished as being too cocky for his own good was the All Black fly-half Carlos Spencer. He sported tattoos long before they were de rigueur in the professional game, and every season seemed to bring a new hair style. But you never heard complaints from Spencer’s teammates or coaches. “We need players who are going to push out the boundaries, express themselves and create opportunities,” said Spencer’s Auckland and All Black coach Graham Henry. “He’s that sort of player. He’s not a maverick. I find him an absolute pleasure to coach.”

Carlos Spencer
Despite Carlos Spencer’s rich talents, he was treated with suspicion by the more conservative elements of the rugby fraternity (Photo David Rogers/Getty Images)

Readers of a certain age may see in Pollock shades of another All Black, He has the same build as the legendary flanker Michael Jones, the same athleticism and the same footballing skill. Jones was 20 when he made his debut in the great Auckland side of 1985; he marked the occasion with a hat-trick of tries against South Canterbury. Two years later Jones was the outstanding player in the All Blacks XV that won the inaugural World Cup.

In character, Jones is more Wilkinson than Pollock. Undemonstrative on the rugby field, Jones’ Christian faith precluded him from playing on Sundays. Such piety would be hard to maintain for a professional player today because so many matches are on Sunday, particularly in Europe.

Rugby has changed in other ways, too, since Jones’ time. It has become a global sport, thanks to television exposure, but so have other sports. Rugby faces competition in a crowded market. It needs characters like Pollock: showmen, pantomime villains, wind-up merchants, whatever you want to call them.

Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking and that can only be good for the game.

Download the RugbyPass app now!

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

Comments

13 Comments
B
BigGabe 4 days ago

If there are admins here, please let me know why my comments are being automatically deleted?

B
BigGabe 4 days ago

Is there a word count?

I
IkeaBoy 4 days ago

Great read.


Slightly harsh on Michalak. I always thought it’s only the Kiwis of a certain age that didn’t like him. And only on the back of one game.


I think world rugby was more complicit than the French media in building up Chabal. They always encouraged his ‘lead with the head’ style of play which has only given him progressive brain damage.


I’d be more concerned with the English press re: Pollock than the French. They only get built up in order to knock them down.


Looks a handy player all the same.

B
BigGabe 4 days ago

I may be somewhat incorrect here, given that Michalak played when I was growing up, but I was under the impression that he is remembered quite fondly as a player and deserving of adulation? I always thought that he was fun to watch, but this may also be nostalgia for French flair in the Curry Cup at a time when flair was a foreign word in the South African rugby lexicon. A quick bit of research tells me that he has won the Heineken cup 6 times, the French division a number of times, the Curry Cup, Super rugby silver medal, second highest points scorer for France in history, 77 caps for country, record points scorer for FRA in world cups..is this not good enough? Just curious.


Otherwise, I enjoyed the article. Personally, I stepped away from the world of rugby for a while (moved to the US etc etc) and been slowly getting back into it since the 2019 world cup when an English friend asked if I wanted to follow the tournament with him. As a South African, it has worked out well for me tbh. But your point that rugby is conservative is something that has really bothered me in the last few years - it’s something that I just do not understand. As a Saffa, I am obliged to dislike Pollock when he pulls on a national jersey - that comes with the territory. A huge part of that is also bc I would love to have this kind of guy on our team (nothing against our team), his work rate and energy is infectious and clearly he has a positive effect on his teammates. How can a fan of rugby dislike him, or think his antics are too much? Are supporters and/or the media afraid of having someone with opinions in the sport? Genuine question here, looking for genuine answers.

P
PR 4 days ago

It’s a valid question. I think personality is one thing but when it comes to Pollock it crosses over into posturing and taunting - things that are more associated with the brash world of football. He is clearly very talented and has a big future ahead of him but his antics is contrary to the spirit of rugby where you play hard without taking the p*** out of the opposition and supporters.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
Search