Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

WRU to take control of Dragons

By Jack Davies
Newport Gwent Dragons’ Dorian Jones.

The Welsh Rugby Union (WRU) has announced its intention to assume control of Pro12 side the Newport Gwent Dragons.

The region has been seeking investment for almost a year and the proposed takeover deal will also see the WRU acquire the Dragons’ Rodney Parade stadium, which is shared with Newport RFC and Newport County FC and has become notorious for the state of its playing surface this season.

July 1 has been set as a targeted completion date for the transaction.

“All parties recognise that from an NGD perspective significant improvement is required on and off the pitch and that it is now time to take a different approach,” said WRU Group chief executive Martyn Phillips.

“This investment is equally designed to safeguard Newport RFC and its rich history at Rodney Parade and provides a long-term programme where we focus on putting in solid foundations to ensure a sustainable and successful team in the region.

“Without this action the future of both the NGD and Newport RFC is at best uncertain, along with the existence of Rodney Parade.

“There is still a lot of hard work to be completed before the proposed transaction proceeds, but it is important to recognise that there will be no magic wand.  

“Above all we want to safeguard the future of regional rugby in the area and, in turn, support the 73 clubs in the region and their stakeholders.

“A WRU working party will be engaged as soon possible, to consider all of the issues raised and to provide a clear way forward in the long term.”

Dragons chief executive Stuart Davies added: “There is further hard work ahead, but this could be a historic moment for Newport Gwent Dragons supporters.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers 'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers
Search