Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

What Smith as the England 10 means for Youngs compared to Ford

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)

Centurion Test scrum-half Ben Youngs has explained he doesn’t really have to change his game when paired together with international level rookie Marcus Smith compared to his long-established England partnership with George Ford. The Youngs/Ford axis goes way back to the Stuart Lancaster era, predating the current regime of Eddie Jones who took over for the 2016 Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Youngs/Ford continued to be Jones’ preferred halfback partnership, the duo starting the 2019 World Cup final together, but the outlook is now very different heading into the 2022 Six Nations which starts next Saturday away to Scotland. 

A veteran of 110 England appearances, Youngs’ last 15 starts since he was benched versus Scotland in February 2020 have seen him paired with four different No10s. He was picked to start with Ford on eight occasions and ran out on another four occasions with Owen Farrell as the chosen out-half. However, the landscape changed in November, Smith starting at No10 against the Wallabies and the Springboks after George Furbank had the jersey versus Tonga. 

Video Spacer

Saracens vs Bristol Bears – The Showdown 2

Video Spacer

Saracens vs Bristol Bears – The Showdown 2

That Autumn Nations Series took place amid the backdrop of Ford being dropped from the squad by Jones and only after Farrell suffered an ankle injury that required an operation last week was Youngs’ Leicester teammate called back into the England fold. 

This return of Ford to the setup will add a layer of intrigue ahead of next Thursday’s announcement of the starting England team to take on the Scots at Murrayfield, but what has it been like in the meantime for Youngs adjusting to the presence of Smith having had Ford and Farrell as his regular Test level half-back partners for numerous years? 

Related

“I wouldn’t say my game changes when I play with Marcus,” reckoned Youngs, who made a Test debut in March 2010 in Edinburgh at a time when Danny Care was the favoured No9 with Jonny Wilkinson at No10 under Martin Johnson. “If anything him [Smith], George and Owen are all very established fly-halves. For me, it’s just picking up on that.

“With George, I play with him week in week out (at Leicester) so you get that understanding without him having to tell me what he wants, I just know what he wants. With Marcus, we have just got to do a lot more work away from the field just making sure I am clear on what he wants.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I want to be able to service him, as Harry (Randall) and Raffi (Quirke) do. I want to be able to give him the ball and the service that he wants, so a lot of the work with him is probably done away from the field as such.

“Then when we hit the field we have hopefully ironed it out over a laptop looking at footage and then we hit with it. But yeah, I don’t feel like I need to change too much. It is just more of a better understanding of exactly what he wants.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 16 minutes ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 3 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 9 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth
Search