Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'They were better than us and they have a massive squad physically and numbers wise'

By PA
(Photo by Ross Parker/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Edinburgh head coach Richard Cockerill bemoaned an error-strewn opening 10 minutes from his team as they were knocked out of the European Challenge Cup by Bordeaux Begles. The Scottish capital side gave it everything in France despite a nightmare start which saw them fall 14-0 down.

ADVERTISEMENT

Edinburgh weathered the storm to go into the break 14-3 behind and although they rallied even further in the second period with a try from Damien Hoyland, it was not enough for victory as they lost 23-14.

“We always want to win these games, but Bordeaux are a very good team and they showed that today,” Cockerill told BBC Scotland. “We had a pretty poor start to the game being 14-0 down, but I thought the lads came back well and worked hard.

Video Spacer

What do Owen Farrell’s teammates think of his tackling? – | Alex Goode

Video Spacer

What do Owen Farrell’s teammates think of his tackling? – | Alex Goode

“We gave ourselves a shot at winning the game and we weren’t quite good enough, but after such a poor start we have some satisfaction we got back into the game.

“Bill Mata fumbled the kick-off which is unusual for him. That’s the pressure of games. At this level those are the differences.

“We gave ourselves opportunities and I’m never going to say it’s alright to lose, but today they were better than us and they have a massive squad physically and numbers wise.”

Edinburgh got off to a calamitous start when Santiago Cordero sprinted 40 metres to score in front of a 1,000-strong crowd at Stade Chaban-Delmas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matthieu Jalibert added the extras and then Jaco Van Der Walt shanked a routine penalty in the sixth minute to add to Edinburgh’s woes.

Jalibert offloaded in a tackle to centre Jean-Baptiste Dubie for Bordeaux’s second try which he improved to leave Cockerill’s men in real trouble.

Edinburgh stayed in the fight and Van Der Walt cut their deficit with penalties either side of half-time before Hoyland went over following brilliant work by Darcy Graham.

There was a nervous final 10 minutes for the home side when replacement prop Ben Tameifuna went to the sin bin and Blair Kinghorn cut the gap to six points. But Ben Botica confirmed the home win with a penalty from in front of the posts with the last kick of the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bordeaux will now face Bristol and their former team-mate Semi Radradra in the semi-final. Their winger Ben Lam will also face off against his uncle in Bristol director of rugby Pat.

“It’s disappointing as we could and should have done better,” Cockerill added. “But we’ve got to keep learning these lessons and hope in 12 or 24 months we’re talking about winning these games.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 5 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search