Northern | US

The Wallabies’ three biggest concerns ahead of All Blacks clash at Eden Park


Hunter Paisami of the Wallabies takes on the defence during The Rugby Championship match between Australia Wallabies and South Africa Springboks at Suncorp Stadium on August 10, 2024 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)
Comments
110 Comments

The Wallabies have done the unthinkable by putting 42 points on the Springboks in Perth; it is a statement scoreline by the now sixth-ranked Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

For all the talk about officiating, downed communications, and substitution confusion, the Wallabies nevertheless found a way to score five tries and three penalty goals, all adding up to 42 points.

The Wallabies had the Springboks dead to rights with just 10 minutes left in the game, 42 points to 17, a margin of 25 points, or more than three converted tries.

VIDEO

Anyway you cut it, the Wallabies were dominant over this heavily reshuffled Springboks side.

What is perhaps more pleasing is that this is the Wallabies’ closest thing to an 80-minute performance as one could get; down to 11 men with plenty of time and a hungry bombsquad on their own tryline, the Wallabies battened down the hatches and defended for their lives.

Effort upon effort, gamesmanship, and stellar leadership from the broader group meant the Wallabies held off the Springboks’ fightback, staunching their point scoring, running the clock down, and finishing the game 42-38.

Head coach Les Kiss was ecstatic at full time, and so was the entire Wallabies team, because their belief in each other, the nous employed by the coaches, and the game plan and bench selections all paid off.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the win now undoubtedly well enjoyed and savoured, it’s now time to look ahead to the Wallabies’ holy grail, their Everest, the toughest matches they will play all year: the Bledisloe Cup.

Related

Centre pairing takes centre stage

Hunter Paisami and Len Ikitau, the trusted centre combination which first took shape under Dave Rennie, has now returned, and boy do they look better many caps later.

Kiss is a huge fan of Paisami, and you certainly can’t blame him; Paisami is often maligned for being too small for the Test arena, but he supplied plenty of punch, wit, deft little touches, and starch in defence to rebuff the naysayers.

Alongside Paisami, Ikitau stood very tall indeed in his no.13 jersey, and yes, it is his no.13 jersey, because although others can play there, it is clear that he is the best in the country at it.

ADVERTISEMENT

While much of the conversation has been about the defensive difficulty the no.13 position presents, it was actually attacking from outside centre that saw Ikitau shine.

Since November 2024, the No.13 jersey has resided with Joseph-Aukuso Suaallii, and so much of the talk has been about ‘how do the Wallabies get him into more space?’

The short answer is: you don’t; you put Ikitau there, and he creates his own space.

Ikitau made 10 carries for 85 metres, second only to Max Jorgensen, and Ikitau was way ahead of Tom Wright in third place, who finished with 46 metres.

Ikitau beat a game high of five defenders with two linebreaks, and finished the game with two tries.

His defensive game was a little less shiny, but bar the one big miss on wonderkid Cannan Moddie, who put away Edwill van der Merwe for a try, he tackled at a steady 75%, making 3/4 tackles.

Paisami inside him was equally impressive, setting up one of Ikitau’s linebreaks from near their own 22m and trucked the ball up 11 times for 24m.

Paisami was either the conductor, throwing one pass fewer than flyhalf Ben Donaldson, or he was the demolition man carrying the ball the second most times for the Wallabies.

This centre pairing has legs, and we have known that since the Rennie era, but now the Wallabies will be sweating on the fitness of Ikitau, who hobbled off with an ankle injury, and Paisami, who is facing a disciplinary hearing after his high tackle on Sacha Feingberg-Mngomezulu. 

It throws a huge spanner in the works and could see an entirely new centre combination for the Bledisloe, which is far from ideal and is a connection breaker if the Wallabies are to lose two of their best.

Related

The Wallabies’ set piece strength is set for a serious shake up

The Wallabies front row held firm when the pressure came on at scrum time.

The Wallabies also continued their extremely high lineout completion rate and banked a 92% success rate against Eben Etzebeth, Franco Mostert, and Lood de Jager. This is no mean feat.

At scrum time, the front row of Angus Bell, Brandon Paenga-Amosa, and Allan Alaalatoa, as well as Taniela Tupou in the second half, held their own and at times gained ascendancy.

The Wallabies were aided by good technique as an eight and the ballast of having 136kg Lukhan Salakaia-Loto in the second row, behind the tighthead props Tupou and Alaalatoa.

This was even with the bomb squad of the best front row in the world coming on in Ox Nche, Malcolm Marx, and Wilco Louw after halftime.

However, as the minutes dragged on in the second stanza, the Boks began to gain the upper hand, and a scrum right on 56 minutes showed how the tide had clearly turned.

Replacement loosehead prop Aidan Ross struggled around the field and particularly at the scrum.

It may be a little unfair to lay all the blame at his feet, as the Wallabies lost their eighth man in the scrum and captain, Harry Wilson, in the 69th minute, but the Boks had all the momentum at the set piece after Bell went off in the 62nd minute.

The issue remains: the Wallabies are in desperate need of a James Slipper replacement in the no.17 jersey, as Bell has sewed up the starting role in no.1.

Blake Schoupp is still on track to recover from his injury midway through the Nations Championship in November, but will have no rugby under his belt, and Tom Robertson was folded in the scrum by Brady Dawson in Super Rugby AUS.

The Wallabies are seemingly stuck with rotating Ross and Isaac Aedo Kailea unless Kiss calls on new Queensland Reds recruit Tom Lambert or Brumbies big-boy Lingeton Ieli. 

Neither has any Test experience but has played at representative level with Australia A and First Nations x Pasifika, respectively.

There is also one final caveat to this strength: Tupou is back off to France to join his club side Racing 92 in Paris, as the official World Rugby regulation-9 window is now over.

This means that Kiss must now turn to Zane Nonggorr and Massimo de Lutiis at tighthead prop.

While both will do a decent job at the scrum, Tupou’s vigour around the field, his sting in defence, and immense scrummaging strength will be sorely missed.

This huge Tongan Thor-sized hole on the tighthead prop side will be tough to fill whilst also searching for stability on the loosehead side.

Regardless, the Wallabies should be confident in their set piece heading into the Bledisloe Cup, but they are an injury to Bell away from going from strength to weakness at the scrum; at the lineout, they have proved they have depth.

Related

Rugby is being driven by who wears No.9 not No.10

If it wasn’t clear who was the master and commander of the Wallabies side before the game, it is clear as hell who it is now.

Ryan Lonergan, the highly experienced Super Rugby Pacific halfback, is taking to Test rugby like a duck to water, and his game driving is what is taking the Wallabies’ attack to new heights.

His pass selection, his box-kick height, weight, direction, and ability to control tempo- fast or slow- and to change it in the blink of an eye is making his teammates live up to their potential.

While many will be discussing the performance of flyhalf Ben Donaldson, who had admittedly good and bad moments, the flyhalf is no longer the general he once was.

Donaldson had a solid game; he grew into the contest, making a few handling errors and poor passes early, which later became over-the-top passes into space and a couple of decent carries.

He kicked well, exited well, and didn’t get exposed in defence. That is the type of game which can put the Wallabies in the right parts of the field, and it is enough at present to allow the Wallabies to play their game.

This is reflected in the number of passes thrown: Donaldson threw 17 passes, Paisami threw 16 passes, and Lonergan threw a whopping 74 even though he was off the field for 10 minutes.

Oh, and if it wasn’t crystal clear how highly Kiss rates Lonergan before this match, he kept his Reds halfback Tate McDermott unused on the bench for the full 80.

Lonergan is the first name on the teamsheet every week for his leadership and game-driving ability.

As long as he is at halfback, the Wallabies carousel at no.10 can continue, not that it should; Donaldson should be given first crack at the Bledisloe at Eden Park.

With the selection continuity precarious at centre, the Wallabies will want to keep as much of their side unchanged as possible, and that goes especially for the halves.

Perhaps the biggest issue is that with McDermott unused on the bench, the Wallabies are relying very heavily on Lonergan as well as on Bell in the front row, it highlights just how shallow the depth is in some crucial positions across the side for the Wallabies.

World Rugby Rankings now in the RugbyPass App

NEW IN THE APP: Official World Rugby Rankings hub! Compare team rankings side-by-side, with data going back 20 years.

Download the RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

110 Comments
B
B 12 days ago

If today was perfect, there would be no need for tomorrow…

P
PB 12 days ago

I wouldn't worry too much about that. The last loss was by a point and then the Boks went to Ireland and totally humiliated and humbled your blokes. Those scars run deep I see.

You see winning matches and getting no trophies is kind of meaningless. Guess you myst have won most of those matches in 1897

B
B 13 days ago

We’re the most successful team of the 6N era as we've won significantly more matches. Even more than the French…


Pools don't count? I'm not hearing you thanking us for hiding Scotland last RWC. Cause the Boks were going home in the pools otherwise


Welcome!


If the momentum has shifted why have the Boks lost 3 of their last 5 against the ‘spuds’?


Ask any of those SA franchises what choking - not least in a final -means

P
PB 13 days ago

Still waffling Spud. Winning a pool game in the RWC is as insignificant as they come. Participation award just like your u13 froggy swim.

And for all your bluster the Spuds aren't even that good in the 5N and 6 N tournaments. Even Wales hold more 5 N titles than the Spuds


You have had the wood over the Boks in recent years, mostly I suspect because we used to play them at the end of our season. That momentum has shifted now.


Fact is, you still choke in big moments! So crowing about a solitary win in 10 RWC tournaments of the World Champions was just laughable. Especially seeing that Ireland were ranked 🥇

B
B 14 days ago

And those same Boks are still 0% against the ‘spuds’ in their favourite thing - RWC…


Obviously you wouldn't know what a triple crown is but they started dishing them out 40 years before the Saffa's could even field a team…


Frozen out of international sport for decades, eye gouging, sack grabbing, aggressive non-compliance with anti-doping…


The all conquering, almighty ‘Lance Armstrong invitational XV syringeboks’


While SA franchises were busy blowing home URC finals the ‘Spuds’ were winning a test series in NZ


You should give it a go this century. It's not for everyone though


Rugby existed before 1987. Forgive me, I meant before 1995

P
PB 14 days ago

Triple Crown? What is that even? 🤣😂😂😂

Lol it is like kissing your sister. You can't win the 6 Nations but you can beat Wales (Wow anybody can beat Wales), Scotland and England ( Also no major achievement)


You spuds are a joke! Never! Read that again! NEVER EVER progressed past a QF phase of 10 RWC’s

Lol 😂 🤣😂😂😂😂

And you want to come talk trash about the Boks. 4 RWC in 8 attempts. 2 back to back, RGR winners, Back to back RC winners, Back to back Junior RWC winners, back to back Seven’s Series winners! Lol it is laughable that you even try compare 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂

B
B 14 days ago

Well I personally haven't won anything…


My team though won another triple crown just a few months back


I've my fast Freddie the frog 20m swimming badge from my childhood. That's enough

P
PB 15 days ago

And what was that? The Dung Beetle award?

So in essence you haven't won anything in the last 50 years? 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

B
B 15 days ago

Our first trophy was won in 1894…


Whoops!

P
PB 15 days ago

I didn't ask, seeing the answer is as irrelevant as you. You just waffle on, in semi circles.


Clearly you are too embarrassed by the lack of silverware! You just talk nonsense without substance or relevance

B
B 15 days ago

The boys from the county hell!


We've been over this already

P
PB 15 days ago

Who have the Boks not beaten in a RWC? Maybe because you never make it that far ? 🤭🤭🤭

L
LD 17 days ago

JEN, FIRSTLY I SUFFER FROM BLURRED VISION SO YOUR STATEMENT IS SIMPLY IGNORANT AND WE ARE DOUBLE WORLD CHAMPIONS. RUGBY UNION IN AUSTRALIA IS AN ELITIST SPORT BUT IN SA IT'S FOR EVERYBODY. AUSTRALIA IS A FANTASTIC COUNTRY BUT YOU ARE NOT GOING TO WIN THE WORLD CUP.

c
cnw 17 days ago

The Aussies look stronger than the ABs in the line outs, collisions, mauls and high ball receipt and they will enjoy parity at least in the scrum. I think the ABs are a level above in terms of fluidity movement, continuity and finishing. But the AB selections are pretty conservative too. Best chance for Aussie in a while.

F
FIGJAM 18 days ago

Good points John!


How good is defensive line speed, front foot ball, clean exits, and parity at set piece!


Ikitau has to be 13, everyone else can fall in around that. Paisami has been much improved and has stopped trying to do too much. I think Carter will better exploit JAS on the wing.


Agree back up loosehead is a real concern, rather see Kailea against ABs with some big boppers around him off the bench (LSL/Nasser)


Donaldson looked like it was his first day on the job in the first 20 but will get some confidence from that win. His boot is a real asset

N
NH 18 days ago

Nice one john and some of your points you made pre-game breaking down the all blacks attack against the boks turned out. In particular, wbs found good pay down the blind side and on the bounce back play with wilson and jorgo both streaming down the touch line in the 1st half from that ploy. I also strongly agree with your points re: donno. He doesn’t have to be a creative 10, he just has to manage the game well and put the team in the right areas and get the ball where it needs to go. I thought his big boot (along with lonergan) was very handy and this is by far the best game the wbs have played this year in terms of imposing their style on the game (except italy maybe). Donno could be a great 23 come RWC time and I think could also have a big impact on games from 15 but great to see him playing confidently.


I think the out the back play didn’t work which isn’t surprising given the boks rush (many have tried). But, it was good to see them adjust with hunter hitting ikitau short, going to the up and under, or donno throwing cut outs over the top.


I think it was you (or maybe brett) did a depth chart a little while back and on it I flagged loosehead and 10 as the biggest holes and i still haven’t changed my mind on that. imo, ross isn’t up to it and they need to find someone asap. Is there anyone overseas? Noah still needs to come in imo as well which I know you agree on.


Considering the WBs can’t physically impose themselves on the ABs like the boks do, how do you think les can unpick them to get the bled back?

J
John 18 days ago

Thanks so much, NH. I appreciate you remembering the writings I made before the game.


I think because the Wallabies managed as many post-contact metres against the Boks as they have against any side, with a much greater average as well, the Wallabies should actually be able to do so against the All Blacks.


I know no Aussie Super Rugby Pacific side bullied all the NZ sides, but Reds did get the upperhand on the Blues, Crusaders, and the Chiefs for periods and now the WBs have their best players alongside the likes of Bell, Valetini, Alaaalatoa, so I think the Wallabies actually can bully the ABs up front despite what some may think.


The issue which always arises with the ABs is their ability to shift the ball and play ontop of you with great running lines, elite x-factor players and flooding the breakdown, so what we will likely see is a Tizzano remaining on the bench and see a McRizz on for 30 minutes to kill the breakdown.


Expect to see Nasser and BPA have a pilfering mandate, and in that vein, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Williams start.


No Hooper is a big shame, and no Tupou as well, but to frustrate the All Blacks we need to swarm their breakdown and cut them off at source; that was a big reason as to why the Boks were frustrated.


Likewise, the All Blacks under Rennie have a hard task master re clean out, so we can milk penalties from their overzealous nature if we make the breakdowns contests.

H
Hammer Head 18 days ago

All this talk of B team. It was the C Team. Jet lagged and hungover. Just like I said.

c
cnw 18 days ago

Hungover B+. No impact pack like that gets a B.

T
Two Cents 18 days ago

Definitely some very clear standouts as starters for certain now that the audition period is essentially over.


It's a shame that we don't get to employ the services of Hooper and TT and even Big Will, when he returns from injury, when we would like to be able to.


Such is the nature of the professional game. But since ewe don't control that it's not something we can worry about.


Instead we can look to who we do have. Maybe Ross isn't quite cutting it at the level yet. Maybe Tate isn't back to any sort of form.


Before this game many people were saying the same kind of things about Wright and Jorgo and JAS and many others besides.


So it's probably a bit premature to throw away guys based on nothing more than our fickle perceptions of them based on a handful of performances.


An interesting thing often happens when you put pressure on people to perform and couple it with responsibility.


Those with the right attitude will lift to the occasion. Those with the wrong mentality won't. It's pretty clear on the evidence now which players fall into which categories.


Those in the former have proven themselves but still need to know that the axe isn't far away. And those in the latter might just need to feel the cut in order to play themselves back into contention.


The single most pleasing element of the match isn't that they won. It's that they didn't lose their shape or their grit when they were under siege for most of the final 10 minutes of the match even when they were reduced first to 14 then suddenly down to 11.


That's the kind of defensive effort of old that I remember from my younger days when watching the Wallabies. They may never have struck fear into the hearts of teams like other vaunted sides but they were difficult even sometimes impossible to break down.


Although the lack of discipline is what caused them to be down to 11 players, at no point even with their captain off the field did they give up or even slightly let go of the contest.


They made the Boks have to work for every opportunity they got and as impressive as the fight back was given how much ground the World Champs had to make up it was the resolve of their hosts that carried the result.


Does that make Australia a genuine contender for the World Cup? No. Does it mean that the Boks were shown to be vulnerable and beatable by anyone? Yes.


And I think the most important reminder of all is that rugby is essentially a game of small moments and the team that is able to produce more positive moments is the one that ultimately prevails.


It's not about being better than someone else. That's a value judgement that has no place in critical evaluation of performance.


It's about having the ability to achieve more of what you're trying to achieve than your opponent can and minimising the poor moments better than your opponent does.


For 65 odd minutes in Perth the Wallabies did that. As the visitors began to turn the screws off the set piece, they had to regroup a bit.


But at no stage did they fall away and were it not for a moment of poor execution even when they had a deficit of players Wright would've taken it to the house with a massive intercept against the run of play which would've ended the contest right there.


I think the proof that the Wallabies are on the climb but aren't at the top yet is the fact that 25 points up they couldn't sustain that control over the match and were nearly reeled in.


That's not a criticism. It's just an objective observation about where they are at. The Wallabies have never been a team any side can afford to take lightly and every single time the Boks and ABs do they regret it.


It's why the ABs don't send out B teams for the Bled. They really don't want to risk losing it because even if it doesn't mean as much as it once did, the players care about it and their tradition demands that they never let it go.

R
Rugby3 18 days ago

It does make the Wallabies genuine contenders actually. The belief they will get from that will be enormous. This what they have lacked. Having a proper Australian coach is going to finally unlock their potential. It’s going to shock a few people.

c
cnw 18 days ago

Like this assessment. Credit to Kiss for being brave and smart. This Wallabies team was ideal for the game - big bruising forwards, solid spine, and the right amount of talent in the right places - a stand out for me is how the Aussies turned the kick receipt into reward - it neutralised a significant Bok weapon. Going 6-2 shows that Kiss is prepared to take calculated risks too. It meant he could commit extra mass when needed. The spate of yellow cards means that we dont have a clear picture of its significance in this game - but I am sure we will see it again against the ABs as we see this Aussie team embrace the brutal fast paced game again.

J
John 18 days ago

I think comparing 50 cap Wallabies like Tate and Wright to the likes of Ross is a bad example.


Criticism of a player not performing like I have done previously of Jorgo is exactly that, criticism of a player’s form, not their base ability, which is what I am questioning with Ross.


After more than 100 Super Rugby Pacific games, and one All Blacks cap, you should be able to show up. And I am not basing this of going toe-to-toe with Wilco Louw, that would be too rude, it is the fact he has not showed it all of 2026 or in 2025 when he got his shot. It’s not like he was dominant for Reds either.


He is the right profile, he just taking a long time to deliver. Again, I will say, this is a comment on his playing ability, from what I have heard, he is a great guy and the team like him.


I really do agree with the rest of what you have written here.

L
Lou Cifer 18 days ago

Well done on the win Wallabies! Boks were not good enough for large parts of the game. Continuity is extremely important in test rugby as was clearly evident

J
John 18 days ago

Yeah, it is one of those facts that no one can get away from in the game, need to build connection amongts players.

L
LouisJ 18 days ago

Scoring 42 points against any international team is pretty big. Well done wallabies

J
John 18 days ago

It is an impressive haul that’s for sure!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close