Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The second coming of Stuart Lancaster

By Lee Calvert
Leinster senior coach Stuart Lancaster.

Leinster marched on to the European Challenge Cup semifinals with a comfortable victory over Wasps at the weekend. It was another step in the remarkable turnaround in fortunes for the team’s senior coach, writes Lee Calvert.

ADVERTISEMENT

A lot can happen in eighteen months. It was roughly that long ago that Stuart Lancaster was in the Twickenham stands, watching the home team, England, become the first team to leave their own Rugby World Cup at the group stage. As a proud Englishman, he would have been devastated. And that’s before you add in the fact that he was the coach.

In the year and a half since then, Britain has decided to leave the European Union, pretty much every actor or musician on the planet over the age of fifty has died and Eddie Jones has won two championships and one Grand Slam with the same England squad that Stuart failed so miserably with in November 2015.

Failures like the one Lancaster helmed can be hard if not impossible to recover from. Just ask Gareth Jenkins, who threw his coaching towel in almost immediately after his sacking from the Wales job after the embarrassing loss to Fiji that saw them crash out of the 2007 World Cup. He appeared simply too sad to continue.

Stuart Lancaster had that same look in the aftermath of the last Rugby World Cup, with the blame placed squarely on him and criticism in particular thrown at the decision to select Sam Burgess – at best a premature move and at worst the most heinous decision in rugby since every decision Ma’a Nonu makes at the hairdresser. It would have been easy for him to take the no doubt sizeable payout he received from the RFU and concentrate on consulting or watching daytime TV and napping in the afternoon.

Instead, he set about rebuilding his career, putting himself in the limelight again and bracing himself for the endless questions, most of which appeared to be about Sam bloody Burgess. The problem was that not many people called until last September, when Leinster offered him a senior coach position until the end of the current season.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723660″]

In many ways, Lancaster is the perfect candidate for this Leinster squad. His experience in the England, and before that the Leeds academies, means he a well placed to develop the considerable young talents at the Irish province’s training ground. The likes of Joey Carbery, Dan Leavy, Jack Conan, Luke McGrath and Adam Byrne have one of the leading developers of talent in the business on the training ground every day.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the rush to judge Lancaster after his England sacking, many chose to forget everything he had done in the seven years previous. He shepherded the academy and Saxons squad until he was given the job in of redeeming an England senior squad who had been poor on the field and a set of arseholes off it at the 2011 World Cup.

It was Lancaster who transitioned that squad, handing out new caps and building the base for what Eddie Jones has achieved. The most honest criticism that you can legitimately throw at him is that his decision making at the very highest level is not of the required standard, something that Jones does not struggle with. However, unlike Lancaster, Jones took the job without having to start the squad from scratch. Most importantly, Stu was never a bad coach,  if anything simply too diffident a character to be in the top job.

At Leinster, he is in his element – away from the press conferences and sponsorship obligations he has focused on bringing something extra to their game. Brian O’Driscoll, a man who knows a thing or two about Leinster, stated in commentary at the weekend that you could see Lancaster’s influence running through the side with newfound offloading confidence and the consummate performance of the young fullback Carbery.

The powers at Leinster have certainly noticed and have sensibly decided this week to lock him in for another two years. It is just reward for his talents and his return.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 2 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Storm clouds gather over Biarritz with owner poised to bail out Storm clouds gather over Biarritz with owner poised to bail out
Search