Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The jerseys that the teams will wear at Rugby World Cup 2023

(Photo by WRU)

With 50 days to go before the start of the 2023 Rugby World Cup on September 8, Wales became the 16th team to reveal their Rugby World Cup jerseys on Thursday. Their shirts – from kit manufacturer Macron – are said to be inspired by the Welsh national anthem, Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau.

ADVERTISEMENT

Macron have also produced the jerseys belonging to Italy, Portugal and Scotland. Nike have also been busy, partnering with Argentina, Fiji and South Africa for the finals.

Seven other manufacturers – Adidas, Asics, Canterbury, Flash, Force XV, Le Coq Sportif and Umbro – account for the nine other countries whose jerseys have so far been revealed.

Video Spacer

England World Cup kit

Video Spacer

England World Cup kit

Namibia, Romania, Georgia and Samoa were the four countries at the time of publishing yet to unveil what they will be wearing at the finals in France, but the Namibians have since joined the party with a BLK outfit.

Rugby World Cup 2023 shirts:
Macron (4) – Italy, Portugal, Scotland, Wales;
Nike (3) – Argentina, Fiji, South Africa;
Canterbury (2) – Ireland, Japan;
Umbro (2) – Chile, England;
Adidas (1) – New Zealand;
Asics (1) – Australia;
Flash (1) – Uruguay;
Force XV (1) – Tonga;
Le Coq Sportif (1) – France.

POOL A: France, New Zealand, Italy, Uruguay, Namibia

ADVERTISEMENT

POOL B: South Africa, Ireland, Scotland, Tonga, Romania (pending)

POOL C: Australia, Wales, Fiji, Georgia (pending), Portugal

ADVERTISEMENT

POOL D: England, Argentina, Japan, Samoa (pending), Chile

England Rugby World Cup
The England Rugby World Cup jerseys (Photo by RFU)

https://twitter.com/JRFURugby/status/1672133082642776064

  • Click here to visit the replica jersey section of the official Rugby World Cup shop
ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Where are they now? The Lomu-led All Blacks team that destroyed England Where are they now? Lomu's All Blacks team that destroyed England
Search