Northern | US

The good, the bad, and the questionable from the Wallabies’ first squad of 2026


Australia's Miles Amatosero and Lukhan Salakaia-Loto. Photos by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images and Fiona Goodall/Getty Images.
Comments
23 Comments

The first Wallabies squad of 2026 has been one of bombshell omissions and radical inclusions, making for a very interesting start to the Test calendar.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 37-man squad is a bit more swollen than many had anticipated, leaving a generous amount of room for less experienced picks and a wider net to be cast.

Earlier in June, a 40-strong group of Players Of National Interest (PONI) gathered in Sydney to train; only three players were excluded.

VIDEO

Coach Joe Schmidt has selected the squad, which is almost an even split of 20 forwards, 17 backs, and within this, three debutants.

The forwards are split into six props, three hookers, four second rowers, and seven back rowers.

The backs are split into three halfbacks, three flyhalves, four specialist centres, five wingers, and two specialist fullback options.

While some new men must be introduced to the Wallaby fan base, there are plenty of old bulls still running around, but perhaps the biggest headlines are about those who were omitted from the squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Good

Schmidt has seemingly picked predominantly on form for the most part, and that has been welcomed by fans.

No one is more emblematic of this fact than Brumbies rookie lock, Lachlan Shaw. The 23-year-old has had a mammoth season for the Brums, and his extremely high work rate and attention to detail when he hits rucks are surely factors that would have appealed to Schmidt and his assistants.

Along with Shaw, Queensland Reds fullback Jock Campbell makes his return to the national set-up for the first time since 2022 under Dave Rennie, when he was part of a side that went within a whisker of beating France in Paris.

Campbell has added a yard of pace to his game, which is not common for older outside backs, and has sured up his abrasiveness in contact. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Schmidt has praised Campbell’s rugby IQ and nous, as well as his incredible appetite for working around the backfield.

Elsewhere, Brumbies backrower Charlie Cale, although only playing half the season’s matches, had a sensational start to the season before perhaps being a casualty of the Brumbies’ team slump.

The form criteria has also been strongly felt in the selections for flyhalf, with Ben Donaldson and Carter Gordon being the clear standouts in the position throughout the year.

The third flyhalf, and one of the three potential debutants, is Declan Meredith from the Brums. He had a hot start to the season as well, and while his own form dipped with the side, he nonetheless showed a consistent and complete skill set throughout.

Italy-bound centre Josh Flook has been selected despite leaving the Reds for URC club Benetton, but his form has been unquestionable at No.13, a position which must be reliably stocked ahead of an intense Test window.

The final debutant is man-mountain Miles Amatosero from the NSW Waratahs.

His abrasive gameplay and ballast will be a huge asset for the side, but so will his heft and brawn at the set piece. His job will be to smash rucks, shunt scrums and mauls, as well as set the tone on the defensive line come July.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
4
1
Streak
1
26
Tries Scored
23
-13
Points Difference
31
3/5
First Try
2/5
3/5
First Points
2/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
2/5

The bad

Although form appears to have been rewarded, the squad feels as though it lacks ready-made combinations that are at their peak and some experience in key areas.

Starting up front, the hooking stocks, all three hookers, although of a good age and plenty of club experience, only have a collective Test cap count of 56 caps between them.

Most capped is in-form Brandon Paenga-Amosa with 25, who looks like a clear frontrunner to start against Ireland on July 4 in Sydney.

This cap count, however, dwarves that of the hooking stocks, aside from Jeremy Williams with 25 caps, Josh Canham with two; there are two rookies with none, making for a total of 27 caps in total.

The Irish locks of Tadhg Bierne and James Ryan both have almost triple that many caps each, let alone the more than 150 they boast together.

It paints a stark picture when Schmidt has elected to leave so many experienced locks by the way side.

Although the halves cap count is better, Tate McDermott, with 50 caps, has more caps than all the other halfbacks and flyhalves put together.

The centres and the wingers sit in relatively well-experienced waters, and although Campbell at the back only has four caps to his name, he is a centurion at club level and knows what is required at the Test level.

The exclusion of 38-cap second-rower Nick Frost, 18-cap hooker Matt Faessler, and 78-capped flyhalf James O’Connor means that Schmidt has left some serious rugby brains and experience by the wayside.

The injuries to 37-cap halfback Jake Gordon and 37-cap second rower Will Skelton, as well as 38-cap prop Tom Roberston, have meant that a bunch of experience and game nous is stuck in the casualty ward for now.

While fielding a potentially youthful team against Ireland cannot be helped in some instances, it does nonetheless appear as though some players are going to be cast into the fire prematurely, and perhaps unnecessarily so.

Related

The questionable

The Wallabies fan base has reacted strongly to the omission of Australia’s most experienced Test lock, Lukhan Salakaia-Loto.

The towering lock’s omission had been leaked by the Sydney Morning Herald during the week, but that didn’t appear to soften the blow for LSL fans when the team sheet was eventually officially released.

Salakia-Loto did his part to front-foot the omission that he was obviously aware of with an Instagram post featuring a well-known clip from the video game GTA: “Ah sh*t, here we go again.”

It is the latest exclusion in a long line of omissions dating back to the British and Irish Lions series in 2025.

In 2024, Lukhan was trusted by Schmidt to be an impact enforcer off the bench, but he has fallen out of favour since.

Although Salakaia-Loto’s game indeed needed some work in 2024 and to an extent in 2025, there is no question that his bulk, experience, and appetite for big carries dominated the Lions in 2025 when Salakaia-Loto faced them a whopping three times.

He bounced, whacked, and mauled the Lions for the Reds, First Nations Pasifika, and the AUNZ side throughout the series last year.

Schmidt’s current concern is that LSL is not consistent enough in his performances.

“[He] had some really good moments in Super Rugby; it was just stringing consecutive moments together,” he said in Sydney on Friday.

“We’re looking for him to have a block to get into the best physical shape to contribute to the team.

“We need fast jumping locks. We know he’s got that speed, but isn’t quite where we’d like him to be at the moment.”

It is a bit of a head-scratcher with Schmidt trusting Skelton seemingly unequivocally, who never jumps in the lineout and who is hardly the most mobile forward you can field.

Salakaia-Loto, with his 45 caps, is the most experienced lock that has pulled on a Wallabies jersey since the Rugby World Cup, eight more times capped than Skelton and a few years younger.

This is a mind-boggling decision when considering that none of the locks have any sort of partnerships or time playing together, with Schmidt picking one lock from each provincial side.

Josh Canham and Lukhan were a ready-made partnership to go with a seemingly Reds-dominated spine for Test number one against Ireland.

This is a really big question mark as well, considering the Wallabies only had a lineout success rate of 68% last time they played Ireland in November of 2025.

In that encounter, Matt Faessler was the hooker, with Tom Hooper and Jeremy Williams being the locks.

Considering the inexperience in the second row, bar Faessler, this could be the second row that is wheeled out on July 4 in Sydney.

The lineout is of particular concern because Schmidt admits that the Wallabies’ strike rate in Ireland’s 22m-zone in their latest encounter was high before the lineout went awry.

If one hasn’t chosen combinations to avoid a repeat of those stats, then we could be looking at a similar situation.

The omission of Frost and 50-cap Matt Philip also raises some eyebrows here, as well as the exclusion of Darcy Swain, although the trio is not in the best form.

The proof will be in the pudding come gameday and in that first Wallabies lineout.

Related

The wrap

It is, overall, a hugely exciting squad, full of in-form players, returning stalwarts, and excellent X-factor talent.

The group will take stock of the fact that they are one year more experienced, one year older, and knowing they have the talent to worry Ireland, as they did in the first 40-minutes in Dublin only eight months ago.

However, Schmidt’s tenure is coming to an end after July, and his legacy at the helm will be judged on these performances.

Should the Wallabies lose all three, there could be pitchforks ready for Schmidt surrounding the selections, but should the Wallabies win two out of three, there will be a recognition of growth and improvement, and a vindication.

It is perhaps a high bar to set, especially considering the Wallabies lost to all three of their July opponents in their final three matches of the Autumn Nations series only nine months ago, but that is what elite sport demands.

Ireland, France, and Italy are all known quantities to the Wallabies, and on home turf, the Wallabies must claim two scalps to truly prove they are a better side and in a better place than in 2024.

RugbyPass App Download

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!


Whether you’re looking for somewhere to track upcoming fixtures, a place to watch live rugby or an app that shows you all of the latest news and analysis, the RugbyPass rugby app is perfect.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

23 Comments
K
KwAussie 44 days ago

So picking another Swinton like player who thinks he’s tougher than he actually is and spends all his time trying to prove it instead of playing rugby. What a joke. Amatosero has constantly been outplayed by every team in Super rugby and Ireland will be laughing at his inclusion. The Wallabies are heading for a 0-3 result under Schmidt and it’ll be Kiss who will need to bring them back.

T
Two Cents 44 days ago

But Swinton is gud now, haven't you heard? French rugby has turned him into a proper hard nut rugby player instead of the grub that he used to be so all good. Maybe Miles needs to go over there as well to git gud.

A
Ardy 44 days ago

Rubbish! It is comments like this that help to destroy our locking stocks. The job done on Swain (and Swinton) was OTT and ensure our locks are small with little impact apart from an ability to run.

Until we learn how to develop great locks and props we will continue to be the team that loves to run, but ain’t great at it ATM. In the tight and the breakdown we are easy fodder, apart from heroics from McWright, and efforts by Daganau.

M
Mzilikazi 45 days ago

“Schmidt’s current concern is that LSL is not consistent enough in his performances.” Nonsense !

A
Ardy 44 days ago

Leaving out LSL is a great mistake. A locking duo of LSL and Amatosero could have been a powerful answer to skilled and experienced locks expected from Ireland.

I think that Schmidt is a good coach but an average selector.

T
Two Cents 45 days ago

It's not a very satisfactory justification for his exclusion and they will probably miss his physical impact.


The more honest explanation would be that he hasn't contributed in the lineout in the way that the Wallabies would want him to despite clearly standing out in virtually every other aspect of the game.


And that given the “kicking” styles that their 3 opponents in July have a penchant for, lineouts and aerial work are at a premium and he just isn't really seen as someone who delivers much threat in the air.


If he can add these areas to his game, there will be no excuses for not selecting him.

T
Two Cents 45 days ago

What we never get to see regarding Wallabies selection is the full picture of what the coaches are relying upon to inform them about who they want available to them versus who they are actually going to select for the match day 23.


I would be skeptical about choosing any side that largely resembles any previous squad iteration on nothing more than incumbency and alleged experience.


Yes, international rugby tends to chew up and spit out the unprepared but when much of your experience has been gained in defeat and you're not currently in form then serious question marks should be raised about whether you are the best choice.


Evidently the lack of lineout performance across the Australian franchises this year and even across the last November series has been a big contributor in pushing the selection in the direction it has gone for the July window.


General work rate and set piece performance specifically at scrum and lineout time are non-negotiable for international level forward packs and contribution in just a handful of areas cannot be sufficient ground on which to justify selection.


I don't think any of the Brumbies forwards other than Shaw really demonstrated any consistency in their output across the year and most dipped after their very promising start to the year. Cale earns the nod as well because he showed up every time he took the field.


Slipper has carried a hell of a lot on his broad shoulders this year and he cannot continue to do it alone as he has done. Hence why the beginning could be so explosive but then the year faded drastically. So perhaps I'm a bit harsh on him when really he didn't do much wrong he just lacked the support he needed to have more impact.


AAA is awesome when he's on but at the moment he's not back to where he was and we shouldn't treat him as if he is. Pollard has gone off a cliff for some reason and probably needs some time out to reflect, regather and refocus before he's given the reins again.


Frost and Bobby V have been very invisible this year and probably need some time off. Reimer and Scott never quite reached the level they needed to to prove their place. And TTT has been sorely missed for most of the season. Would've been a definite inclusion if he hadn't been injured and not doubt would've had a significant impact on the Brumbies season.


The back line grossly underperformed with Lonergan and Meredith both lucky to have impressed enough across the opening rounds of SR to be selected despite not really deserving the chance. And Wright is not right yet. He needs more time to rebuild. He should have been considered for Australia A not the Wallabies at this stage.


No one else really delivered when they needed to and at best should be selected in Australia A to learn what it is that they individually need to do to get good enough to play for the Wallabies.


A selection process is never going to produce an outcome that delivers the player to each position that everyone universally would agree is the best person for the role. So you have to settle for those that satisfy some performance criteria and that's what the Wallabies have done.


The good thing is that with exclusion comes pressure to lift your game so that you prove too good to be overlooked. I would hope that everyone who missed out this time will do their best to earn their way back into the selection frame.


It wouldn't go amiss to have the entire overseas contingent of potential Wallabies, some 50+ players, to also be considered to put even more constructive pressure on the selection process and drive standards up to where they need to be.


Domestic competition isn't enough when the opportunity for representation is such a limited prospect anyway due to the short professional season. Thus it becomes almost essential to have anyone who could be eligible be in the frame for selection no matter where they ply their trade.


RA still don't seem to have fully wrapped their heads around this concept and until they do the Wallabies will always be hamstrung and out of new ideas. It also afflicts the SR sides because no one wants to go all out lest they suffer a significant injury. So to avoid it they don't put in as much as they should.


Removing this “burden” by having the selection process be genuinely open would mean that no player could afford to keep anything in reserve, thus driving them to always be the best that they can possibly be.


It would also drive accountability by forcing players and their coaches to confront their current form and make properly performance based decisions regarding selection rather than using the twin crutches of incumbency and past glory to justify selection.


We also need to be basing selection on which players can work best with each other. Choosing a team of a stars rarely results in sustained success and much greater consistency will be found in forming a star team.


The Wallabies desperately need to find this star team from amongst their squad of 38 and if it isn't in there then there's no choice but to look further afield. We will only know whether the selections this time are any good once the opening kick off occurs.


I'm not usually one to make predictions because I don't like to gamble, I like to deal in facts. But in this instance my expectation is that Australia will probably lose all 3 of their tests this July and likely the trip up north will be just as dismal.


I also can't see them making inroads at all in the Championship and I wouldn't be surprised to see them draw or even lose one or both of their mini tours hosting Japan and Argentina respectively.


This is going to be a brutal next 11 months for the Wallabies and we will truly see what these players are made of. They will need to dig deeper within themselves than they ever have before to reverse their current trajectory. I would love for it to happen but I'm not holding my breath.

J
John 43 days ago

This is a great and extensive spiel here mate!! Thank you so much for taking the time to put it all out on paper! I think you are on money with a lot of stuff and I really think that a lot of your points are shared with many in the Aussie Rugby public.


You’re stuff around the form and timing of different players feels pretty accurate and it’s true, we could be waiting a few Tests before we see the best of some of our much relied upon stars.

P
PM 45 days ago

I’ll be very surprised if LDL is not back in the picture as soon as Les Kiss is coach.


If workrate is key for Joe’s locks, Shaw, Williams and Hooper do make sense. Question is, can our front and back rows make up for the 2nd rows lack of grunt and can we play an open enough game for their fitness and mobility to become a factor?


As you mention, good to see form and improvement based selections among the backs. I could see Jock Campbell getting picked in the next few games and playing well, he makes good sense and I don't know that his inclusion would necessarily mean Tom Wright's omission. Having both there at 14 and 15 could give us some shape and depth especially on the counter-attack.


Pete Samu deserves a mention as an unlucky omission too. I think he is a bigger and better player now than pre-Bordeaux and had a good season for the Waratahs.

J
John 43 days ago

Pete Samu mention is a great shout. He was imperious and so good for the Tahs! The best no.8 in Aus most consistently I think. He is a better player now for sure!

G
GrumpEd 44 days ago

If you want grunt in the backrow due to the mobility of the second row without LSL, then select Hooper at 6 and Valetini at 8. Wilson to come off the bench around 55th minute when the defence tires a bit. Harry’s carries in tests is even less effective than it is in Super Rugby.


John references that LSL has more test caps than Skelton. True but I would take Will’s big games experience has over the extra eight tests Lukhan has played than him.


Joe has his favourites where he ignores the technical flaws of them and prefers “effort”.

T
Two Cents 45 days ago

Legal physicality and composure in the face of brutality is something that Australian sides have lacked for a long time whilst constantly falling victim to. So omitting the very players who could help you address this deficiency seems unwise.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close