1
{{item.n}}
Sorry Bok fans... this call may come back to bite Rassie
18 Comments
Share 
Picture the scene: you’re helping your dad with a project in the garage. The smell of oil assaults your nostrils as Lynyrd Skynyrd crackles from a tinny radio. Without looking up, he asks you to fetch a tool from the toolbox. But which one?
A wrench? A screwdriver? Both are useful, and both can be used to tighten or loosen. But they are designed for different kinds of work: one gives you leverage, the other precision. Choose one and the entire operation changes.
That was the feeling when Rassie Erasmus listed Siya Kolisi and Paul de Villiers at No.6 for Saturday’s second Test against New Zealand. They may occupy the same jersey, but they represent different ways of solving the problem.
VIDEO
De Villiers is the tool you reach for when the breakdown needs loosening: a bona fide fetcher, built to disrupt the opposition’s flow. Kolisi is the tool you reach for when the mechanism needs keeping in motion: rangier and more connective, at his best when playing towards the ball and keeping the attack moving.
By Tuesday, Kolisi had passed fit and De Villiers was gone. But the question remained: what are the Boks trying to fix?
De Villiers won 19 turnovers in the United Rugby Championship and forced his way into the Springbok side. He did not have his best game against the All Blacks, fading before he was replaced after 60 minutes. But he won an early turnover and led the Springbok tackle count with 12.
That matters because the first Test exposed both South African problems. New Zealand won the turnover battle 14-5, yet the Springboks led 13-12 at half-time and created chances they could not finish. The Boks needed someone to steal New Zealand’s rhythm, but also someone to stop their own attack becoming isolated collisions and desperate decisions. That is the gap Kolisi and Handre Pollard are meant to close.
Erasmus has explained Kolisi’s selection in those terms. “Siya’s really good at sorting that out for us,” he said of the attacking breakdown, a nod to the skipper’s contributions in clearing rucks and providing extra heft in traffic. It suggests the Boks want to retain their ambition while getting the ball away from contact more effectively.
This is where Tony Brown’s influence, conspicuously absent last week, may become visible. With Pollard at 10, South Africa should have a more pragmatic hand on the wheel. Kolisi can operate in the wider channels, fold back inside and offer a pass or offload to runners arriving at pace. The answer to New Zealand’s speed may be to move the ball before the ruck becomes a contest. Tupou Vaa’i provided a useful example in Johannesburg. He appeared in the wide channel and slipped a pass inside for Josh Moorby’s try in a play the Boks will want to mimic.
Still, why name the team on Monday?
Last week Erasmus delayed his team announcement until Thursday, saying it was “to respect New Zealand” and because the less time the All Blacks had to prepare, the better. This week he named the team early, then left the key question hanging.
Does that mean the All Blacks have lost his respect in seven days? Or does respect, in Erasmus’s world, expire at the first team meeting?
The distinction is simple. Last week he was protecting uncertainty around a new opponent and injury doubts. This week he wanted to show intent without committing to Kolisi until he had trained.
Still, it is hard not to question the bet. Kolisi is 35. He’s played only 24 Test minutes in 2026, and this will be his first start since returning from a seven-week injury absence. He may have been cleared, but fit to play is not the same as match-ready for a Test of this speed and importance.
Erasmus has made sentimental-looking bets before. Deon Fourie’s selection for the 2023 World Cup was one of them, and that gamble paid off. But precedent can explain Erasmus’s instinct without making this selection immune from scrutiny.
Maybe this has less to do with tackle counts and repeat efforts and more to do with the authority that has propelled this Boks team to unprecedented heights. De Villiers is one of the form loose forwards in South Africa. His omission is not a reward for Kolisi’s superior recent rugby. It is a decision based on leadership, experience and what Kolisi represents.
As captain, Pieter-Steph du Toit failed in his communication with referee Matthew Carley. As the game moved away from them, his authority seemed to drain. Kolisi is impossible to ignore. He can make the team feel bigger than the moment, even when he is wearing a bib on the bench and cheering from the sidelines.
But aura is not a game plan. It cannot retrieve 14 turnovers or finish a red-zone attack. If Kolisi is starting because he is the best man to improve the Boks’ attacking breakdown, then he must do that. If he is starting because he is Siya Kolisi, Erasmus should admit this is partly an emotional selection.
The No.6 jersey is carrying an unusually heavy burden. De Villiers is the tool for disrupting New Zealand. Kolisi is the tool for giving South Africa direction. Erasmus has chosen the latter and is betting that it can still fix the former.
If he is right, the Boks will have repaired their attack without abandoning their identity. If he is wrong, the selection will look less like clever management and more like a desperate reach for the familiar tool because nothing else has worked.
