Northern | US

'Social' rugby player who claimed he unwittingly let therapist inject him with anabolics banned


Comments
Comment

A social rugby player has been handed a four year ban after he tested positive for anabolic steroids which he claims were inadvertently injected into his body by a sports therapist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dean Ashfield, registered as a player for Clevedon RFC, has been banned from all sport for four years following an in-competition test on 15 March 2017.

He is banned from 10 April 2017, the date of his provisional suspension, until 9 April 2021.

Mr Ashfield tested positive for three substances, Drostanolone, Trenbolone and Clenbuterol. All three anabolic agents are non-specified substances included on the 2017 World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List.

A brick-layer by trade, he was charged with a breach of World Rugby regulation 21.2.1, “Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athlete’s Sample”. He admitted the charge and was handed a four-year ban by the National Anti-Doping Panel.”

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

While he admitted liability, he attempted to explain how the substances found their way into his body unintentionally.

He said he had sought therapy following a knee ligament reconstruction which had left him in severe and constant pain.

He testified that after not receiving relief from conventional treatment, he sought the help of a sports therapist who he said injected him with a fluid that he now believes to have contained the substances in question.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said that at the time he believed the injection to be some form of cortisone.

“The sports therapist mentioned that, given my acute pain, he could give me a shot to ease the pain in my back. I believed this would be some form of a cortisone injection and I agreed for him to give me a shot of the treatment. To be absolutely clear, we did not discuss the contents of the injection and I categorically did not have any idea what substances were to be introduced.

“I trusted the sports therapist and had no reason whatsoever to believe that the injection was going to be anything untoward; it was proposed as a routine pain relief treatment and I took him at his word, at a point in my life where I was desperate to reduce the pain.”

Following that single injection, he says that his back “felt a little better” and he was “able to continue fairly normally at work”. He had no further treatment and he evidently continued to play rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report says that: “Perhaps unsurprisingly, the RFU was gravely sceptical about that explanation”.

RFU Anti-Doping and Illicit Drugs Programme Manager Stephen Watkins said: “This case demonstrates that there are serious consequences to doping.

“Beyond the performance-enhancing effects of steroids, there are significant health risks associated with their use, including kidney failure, liver damage and an increased risk of strokes and heart attacks.”

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 34 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close