Northern | US

'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

Cam Roigard of New Zealand carries the ball against South Africa during the first half at M&T Bank Stadium on September 12, 2026 in Baltimore, Maryland. (Photo by Caean Couto/Getty Images)
Comments
240 Comments

All Blacks assistant Neil Barnes believes that they are “seriously close” to the Springboks after a final 3-1 series result in the Greatest Rivalry Series in Baltimore.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks lead 17-14 at half-time and had a 29-21 lead with 10 minutes remaining before a big decision on a tackle on Josh Moorby led to a try to Kurt-Lee Arendse.

South Africa secured the win with a 43-28 victory after a last minute try to Beauden Barrett reduced the final score. Speaking with Jason Pine in the aftermath, Barnes shared his thoughts on the final Test and the series.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“For anybody that understands the game, not very far at all,”” Barnes told Jason Pine on Newstalk ZB when asked about the gap between the two teams.

“To be fair, I’ve got a Bud Light sitting in my hand at the moment that I’m chewing through, so obviously disappointed. But the more I reflect, the more I know we’re seriously close to them,

“Probably just not getting the rub of the green, or getting a lot of luck in close moments at the moment. They’re probably, you’re fair to say the better team tonight.

“But holy hecka, like there’s a couple of moments of swinging with about 20 minutes to go, where two or three times in a row we come out on the wrong side of a close call.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When asked to elaborate on whether it’s officiating decisions or match moments, Barnes said it’s both but revealed that interference from the host broadcaster, in this case SuperSport, that plays a role in dictating how calls are made.

He said that the two-tiered approach by the South African broadcaster continued to show replays that favoured South Africa and even provide different video to the match officials that wasn’t asked for.

Yet anything that would have favoured the All Blacks was not given the same treatment.

“Sometimes you know you get a bounce or something like that, but yeah, there’s definitely a couple of decisions in there that could have gone either way,” he said. 

“You have to put up with the screens when the South Africans are running things that are showing things entirely different to what the referees asked for, and the referees see it and go back to it. But you don’t get the same luxury when something is on the other side of the coin.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But for us, we can only control what we control, can’t control, and yeah, there’s things that we can do to be better. But like I said right at the start, there’s not much in this at the moment.”

Barnes credited South Africa with playing with more enterprise in the final Test which led to a “good game of rugby” while he believed the All Blacks improved at set-piece time.

“I thought we made a big shift in our set piece tonight compared to what happened last week, so that was good,” he said.

“But at the end of the day, they actually played with some freedom tonight because they were one up in the series, so they couldn’t lose it. And good on them, I thought it was a good game of rugby.

“We’ve got to be in a position where we can actually control the game for longer with the speed of it, fatigue them more. But every time they keep getting penalties for bugger all and get to slow the game down, it brings them back into it.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

240 Comments
N
Nickers 25 days ago

?

H
Hammer Head 25 days ago

My balls. Are lowriders. They’ve dropped and then dropped some more.


🍒 vs 🏉🏉

N
Nickers 25 days ago

?

H
Hammer Head 25 days ago

They’re lowriders already Nickerstain

N
Nickers 25 days ago

Re the Roigard one - Ignoring all the other infringements because Dickson let all that stuff go all night for both teams, I am sure that once SA have successfully counter rucked that is a new ruck with new off side lines. PSDT is not in the ruck so can play the ball. At this point Roigard needs to retreat to the new offside line formed by Vaai in a heap behind him but he stays at the original off side line. Peter Steph is the 9 and plays the ball which is legal. Roigard never got onside and can’t play him. I think if he had at least made an effort he might have been OK. Re Marx there is angle that shows he was short and crawled over the line. As no review was on the broadcast there’s no zoom or slow mo. Certainly would have been reviewed had it been playing on the big screen while the conversion was being lined up. Maybe it was and it wasn’t conclusive enough.

J
JW 25 days ago

I haven’t looked at any test twice yet (I use a player I can control live for stuff I want to know about), watching some stuff now. You think Marx crabbed for that maul try? He was well short but it was kinda one movement/play of the ball he was able to get over the line with all his team behind him.


Looking at this play the first thing I’ll say is a judged my call from the end on camera, I thought Cam was back and took a good step forward when everyone played/went off the ball. In fact he went in to get the ball a bit earlier than I thought and just stayed there until Steph got it. The second is that in applying law it’s a dogs breakfast.


First, there is no tackle. Hooker causes Moorby to go to ground and then he gets over him to form a ruck without actually “tackling” him (in this sense it’s like NFL and anyone can pick it up). Moorby has correctly realesed/presented the ball and steph is the first there. If you wanted to treat it as a tackle Hooker is off his feet, supporting himself on Moorby. Vaai joins over the ball (not against Hooker) and joins to Moorby in the typical fashion. In that legitimate ruck contest all players go to ground. Vaai first has a legitimate bind then DDA and Fourie blast over him and put their hands on the ground to keep their feet, same with Vaa’i, hes still in position so rebinds with Moorby. That ball is not available (if you don’t want to blow against any of these earlier infringements) for steph to just step in and use his hands, it should have been play on or black penalty. Steph would still need to engage Vaa’i and use his feet to play the ball.

N
Nickers 25 days ago

When your balls drop?

H
Hammer Head 25 days ago

when your balls drop?

J
JW 25 days ago

We had ample opportunities to win every game completely independent of any refereeing decisions.

Yep fully agree. Some saw something in the coaching change for example but myself I’m just pleased this time the team showed a bit more which is why this time were thinking more of our own missed opportunities. Previously I was feeling I have to be like every other nation and expect a certain amount of dominance (which is far more impacted by momentum and bad calls), now I feel we can again win like oldschool AB teams through pure abilities with against the odds sorta try scoring movements (except theres still that last pass type thing going on as was with Razors troopers).

I would say officiating was about 10% of the reason we didn’t win any of the last three games.

I would say that would be my traditional take, but I’m feel more these days, and with improved opposition, that momentum is far more important. So I’d actually attribute say double that. In normal play I feel and see a balanced view (there were a lot of times I thought SA got the wrong end of the stick) but I’m not quite sure I’m looking out for them having been negatively effect by certain circumstances (I might see them get an unfortunate call but I’m not quite attuned to the importance of that call to their play like I am with what I know the ABs need/are trying to do. It’s just such a shame that I’ve never found a balanced South African perspective on this type of thing. It always has to come from a neutral as the Saffa takes are just way too extreme they simply go over every call that 20% was against them like it’s a national calamity. You can never get a good feel for what impact wrong calls on them really caused.

N
Nickers 25 days ago

Yeah it will be great.

F
Flankly 26 days ago

Claim credit when you win, and cry foul when you don't.


Rugby used to be better than that.

H
Henrik 26 days ago

I am more than happy to admit the AB’s being the very best team in the world, always have been and always will be ….. I take Boks winning World Cups, rivalry series etc. as our booby prize

H
Hammer Head 26 days ago

Yes, I’m sure you will. Can’t wait to read your dribble. In what I imagine to be a whiney, nasal, high-pitched shrill of a voice.


Did your bollocks ever drop? Or are they still riding high? Or have you had your “pockets picked”?

N
Nickers 26 days ago

Yes both sets of coaches go on TV and talk about refereeing. It sounds like you've had a breakthrough! Is it OK that NZ coaches do this or is it just South Africa that allowed to do it? (This could be an important strep following your breakthrough - I’m really rooting for you!) Wait until you find out how much South Africans complain about the referee when you lose (and even when you win) You’re going to be shocked. Don’t worry I’ll be here to keep reminding you that South Africans respond to losing rugby games the same as everyone else - complaining about the referee.

H
Hammer Head 26 days ago

As opposed to your coaches who go on TV and talk about refereeing? What do they get paid to do?


Evidently, not to win test matches.


Don’t be such an insufferable sore loser. Clean up your knickers and be a big boy. Don’t be like the one’s you complain about, incessantly. Rise above. You don’t have to be a whiney little loser too.

C
Chiefs Mana 26 days ago

We need to stop this moaning and control what we can control (scrums, lineouts, high balls), deal with this rubbish in-house or directly with World Rugby…creates excuses for the players and sets a bad precedent. When did we become like the Saffas with their endless moaning after games; there’s a reason our brand and legacy is unrivalled, let’s not tarnish that more than we have to.

H
Hammer Head 26 days ago

Wow


We learned from you guys.


Honestly, it would probably be easier to just keep on moaning.

B
BleedRed&Black 26 days ago

Rassie Erasmus is the best coach SA have ever had, and frankly the best coach of the professional era, given where he had to start from with the major problems within SA. Have the good sense to recognise that, NZ.


In Marx, Nche, Louw, Etzebeth, Du Toit, and Wiese they have the best players in their position they have had in the professional era, and in Kolisi the best captain. Just like it was with NZ had Coles, Franks, Woodcock, Rettalick, Whitelock, Kaino, Read and McCaw. Have the good sense to recognise that, NZ.


And the Boks are becoming a far more balanced team because Erasmus introduced Brown, then put him on a leash, and their best definitely have another RWC in them, with Nche, Louw and Weise in line for two. Have the good grace to recognise that, NZ.


Rennie's game plan is as unbalanced as Robertson's. Robertson was overly conservative, and he was a dismal selector of backs, and had a backs coach badly out of his depth in Holland. Rennie is overly open, and he is a dismal selector of forwards, with a genuinely hopeless forward coach, Barnes, and a equally hopeless defence coach in Umaga. Both were/are in denial about their defects, which is why neither were/are world cup winning grade coaches. And there is no NZ head coach who is better. Joseph has the defects of both and the virtues of neither.


Robertson was fired because he got badly offside with the players, partly due to his unbalanced game plan. Rennie is popular giving the players the game plan they want, but they'll get sick of losing close games because of it. They could easily lose another two this season. Robertson cut a bunch of marginal Crusaders players after his first, though none of them made the test team, and wouldn't dump Holland. Rennie needs to cut players who are out of their depth/done at this level, most of which are Chiefs in his test team, but won't, let alone dump Barnes.


Rennie's a nice guy, but he's not a winner. The only thing at professional or test level he has won is with the Chiefs when he had Wayne Smith as his brain. Since then, nothing. Lordy, it’s going to be a long year...

C
Chiefs Mana 26 days ago

What started as a great post turned into a hormonal Mark Watson level rant in that you obviously have sour grapes about how Razor was treated…yes he lost the team but he also never produced a statement game in his two years as coach and his players gave up in games (inexcusable), the right decision was made. He chose a contestable kicking gameplan then had Reiko and Sevu as his wingers, mind boggling.


We were competitive in SA (not so much in Baltimore) which is far better than the alternative under Razor. Barnes, Ryan and Umaga all need to improve or be shown the door but like any coach, there’s a grace period. In terms of Chiefs players you’re trying to create a narrative around, ALB shouldn’t be there, Vaai is playing an outsized role (possibly due to Barretts injury) and yep Carter was found out on D. Dmac and Jacobson have been selected by 4 different head coaches for good reason. Who else have you an issue with? Sititi, Parker, ratima, Samisoni all bench/squad players. Tupaea is already a very good international player.


You had your coach, he failed miserably and suitably axed. Rennie’s attacking gameplan isn’t unbalanced, it’s unpolished and when it starts clicking and being backed up by set piece parity and discipline, it is going to be devasting. Tamaiti, Scooter and more growth in our current tight 5 will help us immensely.

u
unknown 26 days ago

I’ve been sucked into this very irritating thing that is commenting on a very irritating authors work.


Supersport was NOT in control of the control room at the Baltimore game. Do your due diligence before making assumptions.

A
Ayre123 None 26 days ago

A wisdom in a hindsight,,,,

The ABs could do few things if indeed they suspected the Boks “fiddling” in the system: they could ask to change the refs at the last minute, they could insist on an independent TV producers too'?

They did none of the above, means it is sour ranting, Suzie style,,,,

D
DP 26 days ago

So will Rennie and Barnes be sanctioned for speaking out against the officials? probably not…

H
Hammer Head 26 days ago

Nope

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close