Scotland Player Ratings - vs England
What a game of rugby.
With the Championship decided the Twickenham crowd initially seemed more concerned with merriment that what was going on the pitch. England appearing to wrap up the game within 15 minutes didn’t help matters.
And then the second half happened.
Six unanswered tries from Scotland and a George Ford try to snatch a draw.
15. Sean Maitland 5
Brought in for the injured Blair Kinghorn and questions were immediately asked of his decision making at 15. Nearly found out again for a non-tackle on Jack Nowell, if it was for the faintest of knock-ons by Ben Youngs. Looked lost at seas at times, which is saying something for a British and Irish Lion veteran. Brightened up in the secondhalf.
Continue reading below…
14. Darcy Graham 8
Electrifying against Wales, Graham struggled to contain the rampaging English backline early doors. Was haunted by a Jonny May, who was at his fleet-footed best, biting in on Farrell for the Gloucester man’s first try. Took revenge in the secondhalf with two brilliantly taken tries. Survived an Owen Farrell armless hit in the 67th minute. He’s a keeper.
13. Nick Grigg 4
Scotland have missed Huw Jones greatly all tournament and it was no different today. Grigg is a game player but question marks remain over his abilities at this level. Tried hard all day but looked out of his depth.
12. Sam Johnson 7
The Rugby League convert is learning the game rapidly, mixing odd errors and lasps in defence with some solid work elsewhere. Only really ignited in the 75th minute, and it was worth the wait. A phenomenal try that will live long in Calcutta Cup lore.
11. Byron McGuigan 5
Twelve metres with ball in hand was hardly a fantastic return for the winger. He also managed to miss four tackles. After a bright showing off the bench against Wales, will be disappointed with a patchy day at the office in what was a rare start for the Sale Shark.
10. Finn Russell 8.5
Struggled with England’s line speed in the first half. A brilliant read for his intercept in the 58th and cemented his place as the tournaments most skillful flyhalf. Was magnificent at times, and you can’t help but wonder what might have been in 2019 had Scotland’s back division not been so depleted.
9. Ali Price 7
Held on to his spot after a decent showing against Wales. Was part of the secondhalf revival, pretty much setting up Bradbury’s try single-handedly. Fell off a few too many tackles to score too high.
1. Allan Dell 6
What Dell lacks in size, he normally makes up with his mobility around the park, but the Lion had a quiet game. Got through a fair share of the tackling duties.
2. Stuart McInally CAPTAIN 7
An unlikely but utterly brilliant 34th minute charge down and subsequent 50 metre run to the line broke the English onslaught and offered Scotland the faintest of hope with halftime approaching. Missed four tackles.
3. Willem Nel 6
Again, didn’t really show in the loose with his trademark carries. Still finding match fitness after a long time out we suspect.
4. Ben Toolis 7
Did he do enough to justify being selected ahead of Jonny Gray? Probably not. The Edinburgh man got through a hell of lot of the dirty work and got through 20 tackles, the highest of any Scot.
5. Grant Gilchrist 6
Tackled all day and when the Scottish pack finally started firing back, he was at the coalface. Carried nine times for the hardest of hard yards.
6. Sam Skinner 5
A relatively quiet shift. Did little on either side of the ball. Scotland have better backrows set to come back.
7. Hamish Watson 7
Earned his 25th cap coming off a barnstorming cameo against Wales. Didn’t quite reach the height of last weekend. Beat three defenders and carried well in general, as well as being his usual pesky self at the breakdown.
8. Magnus Bradbury 8
Was in the right place at the right time for his try. Was everywhere all day and looks to the manor born at Test level.
Replacements:
16. Fraser Brown 6
A high standard for Scotland to fall back on. Did however concede a penalty.
17. Gordon Reid 7
Scrummaged solidly and made 4 of 5 tackles in the loose after coming on early in the secondhalf.
18. Simon Berghan 7
Won a turnover when he came on for Nel and managed seven tackles in an industrious 20 minutes.
19. Jonny Gray 8
Made 13 tackles despite coming on in 56th minute. Still Scotland’s premier secondrow and should be starting.
20. Josh Strauss 6
Came on for Skinner in the 55th minute and was an improvement.
21. Greig Laidlaw 7
Steadied the ship when it needing steadying. Is his future on the bench?
22. Adam Hastings
Came on in the 67th for Maitland and Townsend will be pleased with his versatility. Looks very like American actor Oscar Isaac, although that’s largely irrelevant.
23. Chris Harris 5
Didn’t see much of the ball after coming on for Grigg to be fair. Looked busy.
Comments on RugbyPass
“Johnny McNicholl and the Crusaders” save a Penney. Who has been in camp this week and showed them how to play?
3 Go to commentsSo, reports of the Crusaders’ demise / terminal decline are perhaps just - slightly - premature/exaggerated…? 🤔 Will we see a deep-dive into that by the estimable Rugbypass scribes, and maybe one or two mea culpas? Thought not.
3 Go to comments1. The Chiefs are rudderless without DMac, which enhances his AB chances 2. Chiefs pack are powderpuffs. The hard men arent there anymore 3. They had their golden title chance last yr and wont threaten this yr. Gone in second round of playoffs.
3 Go to commentsHonestly, why did you have to publish such a foolish article the day they play us? 😂
30 Go to comments> They are not standalone entities. They are linked to an amateur association which holds the FFR licence that allows the professional side to compete in the league. That’s a great rule. This looks like the chicken or egg professional scenario. How long is it going to be before the club can break even (if that is even a thing in French rugby)? If the locals aren’t into well it would be good to se them drop to amateur level (is it that far?). Hope they can reset from this level and be more practical, there will be a time when they can rebuild (if France has there setup right).
1 Go to commentsWhat about changing the ball? To something heavier and more pointed that bounces unpredictably. Not this almost round football used these days.
35 Go to commentsThis is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?
35 Go to commentsWow, didn’t realise there was such apathy to URC in SA, or by Champions Cup teams. Just read Nick’s article on Crusaders, are Sharks a similar circumstance? I think SA rugby has been far more balanced than NZs, no?
2 Go to commentsBut here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.
30 Go to commentsIt could be coincidental or prescient that the All Blacks most dominant period under Steve Hansen was when the Crusaders had their least successful period under Todd Blackadder and then the positions reversed when Razor took over the Crusaders.
30 Go to commentsDefinitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.
3 Go to commentsSinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
2 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
30 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
30 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
30 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
30 Go to comments