Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Rugby Australia defend Angus Gardner after red card reversal

By Online Editors

Rugby Australia have defended referee Angus Gardner and asked World Rugby for clarification after cancelling the red card issued to France fullback Benjamin Fall last weekend.

Gardner and TMO George Ayoub sent Fall off 11 minutes into New Zealand’s 26-13 win after Beauden Barrett landed in a dangerous position following an in-air collision.

Gardner ruled Fall had breached Law 9.17, which reads: “A player must not tackle, charge, pull, push or grasp an opponent whose feet are off the ground.”

After the match a World Rugby-appointed Independent Judicial Committee deemed Fall’s contact with All Blacks centre Anton Lienert-Brown ultimately affected his ability to contest for the ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

A statement from World Rugby read: “We did not consider that the Player would have foreseen the events, which ultimately unfolded, and therefore could not have, in our opinion, given the speed of the events and the dynamics at play, taken any preventative steps to avoid the collision with NZ #10 or to have put himself in a position to contest the ball as he had initially planned.”

Fall’s red card was dismissed, with the statement also saying “the referee’s decision to issue the red card was wrong”.

Video Spacer

Rugby Australia high-performance boss Ben Whitaker told Fairfax Media the organisation fully backed Gardner.

“Angus is one of the best referees in the world and I’ve had a lot to do with Angus over many, many years and our view is he made the right call on Saturday night,” Whitaker said. “It’s really unfortunate that a hearing then comes out and suggests he got it wrong.”

“We feel pretty confused when we’ve been engaged and involved at the highest level of refereeing development, then you have this decision handed down.

“It’s tough for Angus and we’re 100 per cent behind Angus to make sure he gets back on the horse and continues to prove he is one of the best referees in the world.”

The review committee stated, “No criticism is made of the referee nor, in our opinion, would any be warranted.”

Despite this, Rugby Australia remains adamant that Gardner’s decision was the correct one.

“We’ve got in contact with World Rugby at all levels to make sure we understood what was going on so that Angus was well supported,” Whitaker said. “How those situations in a game are to be ruled was pretty clear to us. That’s why we feel Angus got it right because World Rugby spent a lot of time looking at how we best adjudicate the sort of things that can happen in those situations.”

“We just want to be really clear on why that’s the case. That’s the cause of our confusion. We want to know the supposed plans going forward.”

Gardner has been named as assistant referee for Saturday’s third Test between New Zealand and France.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough' Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough'
Search