Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Report: New Zealand Rugby eye up Kiwi NRL star for cross-code move

By Sam Smith
(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

New Zealand Rugby [NZR] is reportedly chasing another rugby league star shortly after Roger Tuivasa-Sheck’s early departure from the NRL last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following his early contract release from the Warriors, Tuivasa-Sheck is in line to make his professional rugby union debut for Auckland over the coming weeks, and he could soon be joined on NZR’s books by his former Kiwis teammate Joseph Manu.

According to the Daily Telegraph, Manu is in NZR’s sights as one of the NRL’s most exciting young talents prepares to come off-contract with the Sydney Roosters on November 1.

Video Spacer

Rieko Ioane named to start on the wing for the All Blacks against the Wallabies

Video Spacer

Rieko Ioane named to start on the wing for the All Blacks against the Wallabies

It comes days after Warriors head coach Nathan Brown hinted that the Auckland-based club might make a ploy for the 25-year-old as he looks to replace the star power of Tuivasa-Sheck.

However, Sydney Roosters boss Trent Robinson is confident of keeping hold of Manu, who has won two NRL Premierships and played five tests for New Zealand since making his first-grade debut in 2016.

“There’s no concerns there in that sense,” Robinson said when asked about the similarities between the defection of Tuivasa-Sheck, an ex-Rooster, to union and the possible loss of Manu to the XV-man game.

“There’s obviously lessons learned in how that went about, but that’s life. Joey is a different guy to Roger as well. He’s been here for much longer as well. Roger was only here for a couple of years before he left whereas Joey’s been here a long long time now.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Joey’s always been important to us. Ever since he was a kid and came over here you can see what he means to us as a team.

“He’s been a Rooster, he is a Rooster, and his family are Roosters as well, so we understand. It’d be mad if there wasn’t interest, but we definitely want to keep him as a Rooster.”

It is understood NZR are able to offer Manu $600,000 per season, including a Super Rugby deal, but the league utility – who can cover centre, wing, fullback and five-eighth – could command more than $1 million per year in the NRL.

However, the Telegraph reports that NZR are yet to approach Manu about a cross-code move, but the Hamilton-born product has previously spoken of his desire to play for the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ever since I was young I wanted to be an All Black,” Manu, who stands at 1.92m and 98kg, told the Sydney Morning Herald in 2019.

“I’m still a big fan of them, especially when it comes to World Cups. It’s a pretty big occasion for pretty much all New Zealanders. I love [watching] at the moment, but one day, I would love to play for them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

SVNS - Singapore Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Dan Carter weighs in on who should be Scott Robertson's All Black 10 Dan Carter on who should be Razor's All Black 10
Search