Northern | US

Could Dan Leo's European lobbying be about to pay off for the Pacific Islands Test nations?


Fiji players sing their anthem (Photo by Richard Heathcote/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Pacific Rugby campaigners are pushing Europe’s top unions to agree to a profit-sharing deal that could help transform the Test fortunes of Samoa, Tonga and Fiji.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pacific Rugby Players Welfare (PRPW) hopes to organise a meeting with World Rugby and the decision-makers at the English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh and French unions to thrash out a new deal for the Pacific Island nations.

Chief executive Dan Leo confirmed PRPW has proposed that those tier one nations agree a 10 per cent profit share when hosting the Pacific Island nations in November Test matches in Europe.

Leo said just 10 per cent of profits from a sell-out Twickenham crowd could fund Samoa’s senior rugby programmes for as long as three years. “We have been highlighting problems in Pacific Islands rugby for some time and also lobbying for change, but this really feels like the start of something hugely positive,” said Leo.

“We’ve been in contact with the unions in England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and France, and all have been positive about this idea, and about meeting with us. We’re in discussions with World Rugby too, and we hope the next steps are to formalise these talks in sit-down meetings.

“A profit-share like this would be huge. Say for the sake of argument the RFU could make a £10million profit on a sell-out match at Twickenham. Well, £1million could fund Samoa’s programmes for three years.”

Former Wasps lock Leo was among the group of Samoa stars who threatened to strike ahead of facing England at Twickenham back in November 2014. That squad’s concerns stretched beyond low pay and into worries over union governance, but Leo believes World Rugby has helped the national unions in the Pacific Islands solve many of those issues in the last five years.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A deal like this would mean the union could pay the players more than £300 or £400 for the match, they might be able to afford £2,000 or £3,000 per player,” Leo continued.

“But it’s not only about the difference it makes for players, it could also generate a stronger game in the islands. We feel that home matches against tier one nations are not the answer, the stadia are small and the people there don’t have money for tickets either.

“We need to be able to remunerate players fairly, or in closer comparison to tier one nations. So we want to shoot at the heart of the problem rather than deal with the symptoms.

The eligibility is a symptom of the problem that the Pacific Islands don’t have any money. We need to negotiate some sort of profit share with tier one nations hosting tier two.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So that’s what we’re asking for. But I don’t think a request for a profit share of 10 per cent is astronomical. Player eligibility issues and the migration of talent to Europe is a symptom of the fact the Pacific Islands don’t have any money or any means of generating any money.

“We hope a profit share like this could be the catalyst to help the Pacific Islands set up semi-professional leagues on the islands. And that would help keep players at home rather than heading to overseas to play their rugby.”

– Press Association

WATCH: Former England and British & Irish Lions player John Bentley speaks about the deadly disease Japanese Encephalitis

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close