Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Michael Cheika's parting shot at Raelene Castle

By Online Editors
Cheika during the Old Mutual Wealth Series match between England and Australia at Twickenham Stadium (Getty Images)

Michael Cheika has explosively lifted the lid on his broken relationship with Rugby Australia bosses after confirming he will quit as Wallabies coach at the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chieka won’t seek an extension to the five years he has served after the Wallabies were beaten 40-16 by England in the quarter-finals of the Rugby World Cup.

Less than 24 hours later, the 52-year-old exposed what he said was a dysfunctional relationship with both chief executive Raelene Castle and chairman Cameron Clyne.

He also said he felt uncomfortable working in the new Wallabies coaching structure in which he was answerable to director of rugby Scott Johnson, who took up the role early this year.

“I think it’s no secret that I’ve pretty much got no relationship with the CEO and not much with the chairman,” Cheika said.

Video Spacer

“Scott’s a lovely bloke and I get on fine with him but I’m sort of not really into that type of thing.”

Johnson became one of three selectors and Chei ka said having to compromise on elements of his job impacted on him negatively.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I like to take that responsibility. I found also that it changed my normal routine around things,” Cheika said.

“Not that my way’s definitely the right way, I’m definitely not saying that, always.

“But that’s just the way I like to operate.

“I’ve always prided myself on not compromising my own values and what I want to do. So I found that a little bit difficult at times, yeah.”

Rugby Australia released a statement quoting Castle that didn’t refer to any of Cheika’s criticisms.

ADVERTISEMENT

Castle thanked Cheika for his service and dedication and praised his passion for the role.

“He cares deeply about the Wallabies and the game of rugby, and always set out with the aim of making Wallabies fans proud of the team’s performances.

“Michael came into the role at a turbulent time, and experienced immediate success by taking the Wallabies to a World Cup Final af ter only one year in the job. He was later given the ultimate recognition for that achievement by being named World Rugby Coach of the Year.”

Castle confirmed Johnson would lead the process to find a replacement.

New Zealander Dave Rennie, currently coaching Scottish club Glasgow, has emerged as the clear favourite.

Cheika plans to see out his contract, which finishes on December 31 to help with any debriefing process.

His tenure was marked by the successful 2015 World Cup campaign and a disappointing display at the global tournament in Japan, the respective outcomes marking a gradual decline in the team’s overall performances.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 11 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Chasing the American dream Chasing the American dream
Search