Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Japan's proposed anti-diverse 'blood' eligibility law after foreign player influx

Japan's players react to their defeat on the pitch after the Autumn Nations Series International rugby union test match between England and Japan at the Allianz Stadium, Twickenham in south-west London, on November 24, 2024. England won the game 59-14. (Photo by Glyn KIRK / AFP) (Photo by GLYN KIRK/AFP via Getty Images)

A bombshell report on a planned change to eligibility in the Japan Rugby League One is set to to have ripple effects across rugby the Pacific region.

ADVERTISEMENT

After years of foreign player influx that has boosted Japan’s rugby playing stocks with Australian, New Zealand and Pacific talent, Paul Cully of the Sydney Morning Herald reports that the JRLO is about to tighten the rules based on ‘blood’.

The new blood law proposed from 2026 means that at least eight players on the field must have Japanese blood, a radical change that will impact foreign-born Category A players.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Foreign-born players who have been capped for Japan through residency qualification grounds and who even hold Japanese passports, such as Warner Dearns and Dylan Riley, would not be considered Japanese.

Those foreign-born players would need to reach 30 international caps to be considered Japanese.

The move to tighten its eligibility by the JRLO sets a line in the sand over the growing diversity of the Japanese rugby team, which includes players of Pasifika and European heritage. The report suggests the JRFU has a desire for the national side to be more Japanese.

The booming Japanese market has become home to many elite international stars over the last 10 years, with top line All Blacks, Wallabies and Springboks either signing long-term deals or sabbaticals.

In addition to the growing recruitment at the high-end of the market, a number of emerging younger players in their early 20s were signed by League One clubs to eventually qualify for Japan on residency grounds.

ADVERTISEMENT

There has also been a long standing history of Tongan players attending Japanese University to play rugby, with many of those players also going on to join League One clubs and even represent Japan.

The ‘blood’ rules would drastically reduce demand for foreign player talent with less opportunities for players in the Pacific region.

This may help New Zealand, Australia and the Pacific Islands retain talent but with France still a big recruiter, they may now encroach even further with less competition from Japan.

La Rochelle signing 16-year-old Visesio Kite out of Queensland sparked fury with Rugby Australia just weeks ago, prompting a formal complaint to the governing body.

ADVERTISEMENT

Australian U18 loose forward and elite rugby league prospect Heinz Lemoto has also been recruited by Top 14 clubs but no deal has eventuated.

 

 

RugbyPass App Download

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!


Whether you’re looking for somewhere to track upcoming fixtures, a place to watch live rugby or an app that shows you all of the latest news and analysis, the RugbyPass rugby app is perfect.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

30 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
New law innovations will have unexpected impacts on Super Rugby Pacific

It will be interesting to see how the rucks adjust as the season goes on, to be fair it will be hard to tell as you might have only got half a dozen caterpillars in a normal Super game anyway? I was actually looking forward (statistically speaking) to seeing teams trying to adopt the tactic more (and I don’t mind the lotteryness madhater results of a kick too much) after the success it proved when used in Internationals. Now were unlikely to really see it. I had another thought while watching some of the footy along these lines too, how ref interpretations normally change through the season (they got more lenient of a few of last years changes as the season went on), after Nickers said that they shouldn’t be holding preseason games on hard grounds in Feb, that what if we purposefully introduced law interpretations progressively through the season, if outright law changes, so that the start is very fast and open, mimicking pre season, building towards more of a contest and collisions (where errors start to get expected), and then when its wet possibly it can favor scrums and defense again? Or you go the other way, towards the end of the season why a structure Crusaders has reigned king you introduce laws to keeping attacking in favor?

Bonus is they’d become adept at adapting, and come July or Internationals, will be better because dealing with them has become a real skill?



...

21 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT