Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'It's like being in a family, highs and lows, periods when you don't understand them'

By PA
(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend delivered an upbeat assessment of Finn Russell’s international prospects after admitting he had been in regular contact with the fly-half in recent weeks. Russell was dropped from the squad for Scotland’s Guinness Six Nations opener following a disciplinary issue and did not feature before the tournament was halted just before their final match.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking in a conference call, Townsend said: “We talked during the Six Nations and we talked after the Six Nations and we have been in regular contact during lockdown. Players and coaches sometimes don’t have relationships that are the same all the way through.

“I suppose it’s like being in a family, you have highs and lows, you have periods when you don’t understand them and they don’t understand you.”

Video Spacer

Finn Russell guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer

Finn Russell guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Russell publicly opened up during the Six Nations on his difficulties with his former Glasgow head coach, but Townsend gave every indication that the Racing 92 player would be back on the international scene when rugby resumes.

“The important thing is we leave the door open for players and we make an effort to connect and build relationships with our players,” he said. “We want everybody available to us. I’m sure Finn is really keen to be available and playing for Scotland, as are we with him.”

It was late March in an appearance on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series, that Russell explained how communications between himself and Townsend had improved to the point where the out-of-favour out-half gave his coach an insight into the French gameplan going into the March 8 Six Nations match at Murrayfield which Scotland won.

“I spoke to him before the France game and tried to help him out. Having been here a year and half, (I told him) how I thought they were going to play. I play with a few of the boys here, I chatted about their traits and what I feel they like to do and how they play. And whether they do certain things under pressure, what they do when they have time on the ball and space – and how to potentially shut them down.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I had Lo-Lo [Laurent Labit] as attack coach last year for a year, so I said a few things that they might try and do.  A few shapes he might try and few structures he might try and use. I have kept in touch with a few of the (Scottish) boys the whole time. The fallow week before France I called Gregor. I didn’t know if I was going to get called back in or not, but we thought it best just to leave it for now and then start again after the Six Nations and move forward from there.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 16 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won
Search