Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

IRFU slam 'fictionalised' bugging claims in new British Army spy book

Brian O'Driscoll and Ronan O'Gara (right) look flustered during Ireland's ugly win over Georgia at the 2007 World Cup (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

The IRFU has slammed as “fictionalised” claims that they employed a former British military intelligence officer to search for bugs they thought were planted inside their Dublin headquarters. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Guardian are reporting that a new book by Seán Hartnett, the pseudonym of a former army spy, claims to reveal the extent of the fear within the IRFU over the Irish media’s ability to report on dressing room rows and plans to replace managers in the 2000s.

In the book, Client Confidential, Hartnett says the IRFU asked him to warn members of its board that he would use specialist tracking devices to discover if any of them were covertly recording meetings with their mobile phones.

This happened allegedly in the wake of the internal squabbles that surrounded the sport following the much-fancied Ireland’s failure to advance to the knockout stages of the 2007 World Cup in France.

An IRFU spokesman has claimed that Hartnett “fictionalised” their dealings with a reputable and credible risk assessment company. The IRFU employed a company RMI to “conduct a wide ranging risk assessment of the then newly occupied IRFU headquarters building, IT systems, hotel accommodation, meeting facilities being used by the Irish team and IRFU.”

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

Hartnett’s allegations, though, make for compelling reading. At the time he was employed by the IRFU, the author had just moved from a secret counter-terrorism army unit in Northern Ireland into a private industrial espionage business in the Republic.

He also claimed he was asked to brief the newly appointed Irish head coach Declan Kidney. “Officially, the briefing was to inform them of dangers involving information security. Unofficially, it was to tell him that not all his enemies were outside the walls of the IRFU HQ.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Hartnett wrote that he was brought in to investigate leaks after the contents of a post-mortem meeting about the 2007 World Cup, which took place in 2008 at the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin, were reported “almost word for word” by the Irish media. He concluded the leak at the hotel was probably the result of recordings on a mobile phone.

Hartnett claimed that Phillip Browne, chief executive of the IRFU, was so concerned the meeting had been bugged he eventually called upon Hartnett to search for listening devices as well as deploying other devices to search for possible covert mobile phone recordings in their headquarters. 

Ireland coach Eddie O’Sullivan and Brian O’Driscoll answer questions from the media at Rugby World Cup 2007 (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

Hartnett says he then tested security by easily breaking into their HQ in Dublin’s Ballsbridge through taking an employee’s electronic pass card and then returning to the building via its underground car park. The former counter-terrorist operative says from there he was able to walk straight into the IRFU’s CEO’s office and rifle through Browne’s files.

ADVERTISEMENT

“From there I moved to a room next door where player information, including salaries, was openly on display. I now knew how much Paul O’Connell was earning. As I walked around the building that morning, picking up information as I went, not one single person asked who I was or what I was doing.” 

After issuing his security report, Hartnett says he addressed IRFU board members, telling them that the next press leak would be fully investigated. “Before this meeting began, I carried out a full sweep of this room… if anyone so much as turns on a mobile phone, I’ll know about it.”

He claims the looks he got from Irish rugby bosses were “less than pleasant; in fact, they were downright hostile”.

Spying became a pre-tournament discussion before the 2019 Six Nations got underway, with some coaches claiming their training sessions had been watched in the past.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BtIaaLfAr0l/

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search