Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Forgot About Handre: The Springboks' First Five Dilemma

By Jamie Wall
Handre Pollard

This weekend’s All Blacks vs Springboks match sees arguably the two best first five-eigths in the world go head-to-head in Beauden Barrett and Elton Jantjies. But, asks Jamie Wall, where does that leave Handre Pollard?

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the most one-eyed fans out there have to admit Beauden Barrett is the top number 10 in world rugby right now. The All Black first five has seemingly developed some sort of telepathic relationship with the ball in 2016, whether he’s kicking it, receiving it or running it.

The All Blacks are short odds favourites to dispense with the Springboks in Christchurch on Saturday, which is a shame considering the unparalleled rivalry the two nations have had over the last 95 years. It’s even more of a shame considering the absolute classic tests that the sides have produced over the last few years.

But also, from a Springbok point of view, it’s a shame because they’re the only other side going around these days that can actually boast some depth at first five. Starting this weekend will be Elton Jantjies, who put together a stunning body of work during Super Rugby.

Jantjies’ Lions side defied all conventional logic to make it all the way to the final, and a lot of that can be put down to the 26-year-old’s running and goal kicking. Ultimately, they lost that game (to Barrett’s Hurricanes, no less), but gained a serious amount of respect and hope for the upcoming test season.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473306980″]

Meanwhile, sitting back in South Africa somewhere, is Handre Pollard. On the mend from a season-ending knee injury, Pollard was the Boks’ starting 10 for the last two seasons. He guided them to victory over the All Blacks in 2014 (scoring two tries), as well as booting 15 points in their 18-20 loss to the eventual World Champions in last year’s World Cup semifinal.

Many had pegged Pollard to be the man to take charge of a Springbok backline for the foreseeable future, but his injury and Jantjies’ irresistible form have thrown a little bit of doubt over that.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, he has got the advantage of the fact that the Boks are currently going through one of their lowest ebbs ever. Losses to Ireland, Argentina and now the struggling Wallabies (probably the most embarrassing of the lot) have all come on Jantjies’ watch. It’s unfair to blame him at all – in fact his goal kicking has been one of the rare highlights – but if this season keeps going the way it has it’ll be hard for Jantjies to escape the stigma attached to it.

If Pollard can force his way back with a successful 2017 Super Rugby comeback, it will be a pretty big deal given the contentious racial quota system the Springboks have been forced to adopt by the South African Ministry of Sport. Jantjies has definitely earned his place on merit this season, which either completely justified or utterly condemned the quota system depending on your point of view.

One thing is for sure about next year: Boks coach Allister Coetzee will just be happy to have depth in at least one position. Provided, that it, he still has a job by the end of the season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Lawrence Dallaglio: 'A real problem and it’s only going to get worse' Lawrence Dallaglio: 'A real problem and it’s only going to get worse'
Search