Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Folau hearing set for venue switch

By Online Editors
Israel Folau. (Photo by Tony Feder/Getty Images)

The intrigue over Wallabies’ star Israel Folau’s code of conduct hearing may extend beyond the third day, which isn’t expected to deliver a result.

ADVERTISEMENT

The hearing will resume on Tuesday at a venue in the Sydney CBD, after the first two days were conducted at Rugby Australia headquarters.

It’s not yet known who will appear at the hearing on Tuesday.

The story featuring one of the nation’s highest profile sports stars and his controversial social media posts has gripped Australia in recent weeks.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

While it has also generated some comment overseas it hasn’t been a massive talking point in South Africa, where Folau’s NSW Waratahs side is in the middle of a two-game Super Rugby stand.

“The short answer is no. I think there’s a bit of a political thing going on at the moment over here so there’s a fair bit of that stuff around but not really (Izzy),” Folau’s Waratahs and Wallabies teammate Ned Hanigan said in a teleconference from South Africa.
Folau has missed the Waratahs’ last three game since being stood down by the NSW Rugby Union.

The Tahs have lost their last two, but Hanigan was adamant the issue wasn’t proving a distraction for them.

“Being away, as a team on tour, you’re always galvanised together and you just focus on the job getting done,’ Hanigan said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Speaking on the distraction back home a little bit, if we call it that, there’s a code of conduct process that’s still ongoing so there isn’t much more to say. That process needs to be undertaken so I think as a team we know that.

“As a team we’re sort of pretty focused on the job.”

Among the major rugby figures to appear before the hearing so far are RA chief executive officer Raelene Castle, Wallabies coach Michael Cheika and NSWRU boss Andrew Hore.

The three-person panel has listened to more than 15 hours of legal arguments so far. Late on Monday RA said the panel was unlikely to reach a verdict on Tuesday.

Folau reportedly rejected a $1 million offer to walk away from Australian rugby last week and is fighting to save the multi-million dollar, four-year contract he signed earlier this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The dual international and code hopper was hit with a “high-level” breach notice last month and threatened to tear up his four- year, $4 million contract following his latest round of inflammatory social media posts.

Folau’s solicitor Ramy Quatami and barrister Adam Casselden have argued that Folau’s Instagram post claiming hell awaits homosexuals and other sinners unless they repent and turn to Jesus was merely a bible passage and not his direct words.

They also put foot forward the fact that RA didn’t include a specific social media clause when the John Eales Medallist signed a new contract in February.

But after being formally warned last year when he posted similar passages claiming gays were destined for hell, RA’s legal unit believes the 30-year-old has breached both the player code of conduct and its social media policies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 13 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

19 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Report: Rising Hurricanes star signs with Montpellier Rising Hurricanes star signs with Montpellier
Search