Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

EXCLUSIVE: 'Faf is going to sign for three or four years'

By Chris Jones
Faf de Klerk

Faf de Klerk, who was nominated as a World Rugby Player of the Year, is to sign a contract extension at Sale to head off interest from rival Gallagher Premiership clubs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new de Klerk contract is part of Sale’s bid to attract top Springbok talent to the AJ Bell Stadium with Rob and Jean du Preez being offered long-term deals while Steve Diamond, the club’s director of rugby, revealed to RugbyPass he is targeting a current Springbok hooker, prop and lock to join the club after next year’s Rugby World Cup in Japan.

That puts hooker Malcolm Marx, props Steven Kitshoff and Frans Malherbe and lock/flanker Pieter-Steph Du Toit on the Sale radar.

Diamond believes the success scrum half de Klerk has enjoyed since moving to Sale in 2017 will act as a major attraction to other Springbok stars as it proves playing in England can boost your test chances rather than harm them. De Klerk was in the test wilderness when he arrived at Sale but the appointment of Rassie Erasmus as coach and the 27-year-old’s brilliant form saw him burst back onto the international scene as one of South Africa’s outstanding players in 2018.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Diamond is using de Klerk’s inside knowledge to identify the players he believes can make the squad serious contenders for honours and avoid the kind of yo-yoing they are currently enduring in the ultra-competitive Premiership which sees them head into next weekend’s game with Bristol in 11th place.

Diamond told RugyPass: “Faf’s looking to extend for three or four years and so is Jono Ross. There is no chance of Faf going anywhere else and my message to other clubs is simple “ go and find your own players!” The du Preez brothers are doing well having joined us and we will be looking to extend their stay.

“Our recruitment drive is in South Africa at the moment with some of Faf’s mates. We are in intense talks with a prop, hooker and lock to come after the World Cup, They are all current South Africa internationals and we are in a good place.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Currie Cup winner Rob Du Preez is currently on a three month contract from the Sharks as cover for the injured AJ MacGinty and bother Jean joined on a similar deal to provide extra back row options while Tom Curry was out with an ankle injury. Curry is now back in action but Diamond wants to keep du Preez’s ball carrying ability.

Diamond is to study the ruling of the European rugby disciplinary hearing following four-week ban handed to lock Andrei Ostrikov after he was sent off against Bordeaux for leading with the elbow describing the judgement as “ridiculous” and the club could appeal against the ban. Prop Tom Bristow was send off for Sale in the return game with Bordeaux which they lost 17-14 yesterday.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Dan Carter weighs in on who should be Scott Robertson's All Black 10 Dan Carter on who should be Razor's All Black 10
Search