Northern | US

Ex-France international stunned at Gabrillagues' lengthy ban compared to All Black Barrett's punishment


New Zealand's Scott Barrett is sent off against Australia (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Former France international Gregory Lamboley has shared his dismay on Twitter after his compatriot Paul Gabrillagues was handed a six-week suspension after a disciplinary hearing on Tuesday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The France and Stade Francais lock received the ban for an illegal clear-out of Scotland’s John Barclay last weekend where he made contact with the Scottish player’s head. 

Tweeting in French, Lamboley claimed it was “outrageous” that Gabrillagues received a six-week ban – reduced from a 10-week entry point – while the All BlacksScott Barrett only received a three-week ban for a head offence the week before, meaning he will not miss any of the World Cup. 

Toulouse legend Lamboley clearly feels that Barrett’s offence was worse, or at least not worthy of receiving half the ban that Gabrillagues did. 

Barrett saw red in the first half of the first Bledisloe Cup Test two weekends ago for making contact with Australian captain Michael Hooper’s head. 

The majority of the rugby world agreed that it was a red card for Barrett, although his three-week ban was deemed light as it meant he only missed last weekend’s rematch against Australia and is free for the World Cup. Barrett received a six-week ban but had the punishment halved due to his clean track record. 

With Gabrillagues missing the remainder of France’s warm-up matches and their opening three pool matches at the World Cup, the disparity has started a debate regarding the length of bans and adjudication of offences with Lamboley one of the first to weigh in. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Gabrillagues banned
France’s Paul Gabrillagues has been hit with a six-week ban (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Stade Francais lock Gabrillagues will miss the start of the World Cup, but it could end his participation in the tournament altogether after Romain Taofifenua was drafted into the squad by Jacques Brunel for the Test against Scotland this weekend. 

With World Rugby growing increasingly stringent on the laws surrounding contact to the head, there has been an increase in controversy, particularly due to the inconsistency of officiating between matches. However, it is the inconsistency in punishments that has proven controversial here, opening up a new debate.  

WATCH: Episode one of Onion TV’s three-part series looking inside one of New Zealand’s iconic rugby colleges, St Pats Silverstream

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 1 hour ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

18 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close