Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Cleary takes swipe at Dolphins over recruitment

By AAP
Coach Ivan Cleary of the Panthers. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Ivan Cleary has taken a tongue-in-cheek swipe at the Dolphins, claiming the NRL’s newest franchise treat Penrith as if it is their own backyard for recruitment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ivan Cleary has taken a subtle swipe at the Dolphins, accusing the NRL’s newest franchise of treating his Penrith club as their own recruiting backyard.

The Panthers fought off interest to re-sign teenage outside back Sunia Turuva and fellow local junior Lindsay Smith this week.

Related

Turuva in particular is believed to have caught the attention of the Dolphins, as well as powerhouse rookie winger Taylan May who re-signed last week.

Wayne Bennett’s club have already irked the Panthers by signing young half Isaiya Katoa, while Robert Jennings is also set to head north next year.

The 17th franchise have also been linked to both Stephen Cricthon and Brian To’o for 2024, with the NSW State of Origin pair signed with Penrith until the end of next year.

“One thing is for sure we are going to keep bringing guys through our system, that’s our mandate,” Cleary said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has been well documented we have our challenges in terms of trying to keep this team together.

“To be able to have those (young) guys stay on when they definitely had options to go elsewhere … is so good.

“Everyone is looking at our club now, particularly with the Dolphins coming in. They’re treating our club like their backyard.

“So it’s going to be even harder.”

Cleary’s comment was said with a tongue-in-cheek expression, but comes after then-Penrith CEO Brian Fletcher claimed it was a “waste of time” developing players and wanted compensation when the Dolphins signed Katoa in February.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile Cleary said he was hopeful his six NSW Origin stars would back up to face Newcastle on Sunday, while preparing as if they wouldn’t.

Related

The Panthers’ 30-18 win over Canterbury last Friday came after the Panthers dropped two games through last year’s Origin period, in easily their patchiest part of their premiership season.

“It was a bit of a milestone for our club last week,” Cleary said.

“The same period last year was a bit of a failure, I must say. It was really pleasing to see how they prepared and performed last week.

“It definitely gives us a bit more confidence. I think it just shows a bit more growth in our team this year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 4 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sharks captain Mbonambi addresses controversial incident with referee Sharks captain Mbonambi addresses controversial incident with referee
Search