Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Biggar and North injuries worrying Wales

Wales backs Dan Biggar and George North

Wales intend to wait until the latest possible moment before determining whether Dan Biggar and George North are fit to face England in the Six Nations on Saturday.

The influential duo were each injured on Sunday as Wales began their campaign with a 33-7 win over Italy in Rome.

Biggar was replaced by Sam Davies after taking a blow to the ribs during the first half, while North completed the match in clear discomfort after suffering a thigh injury.

Defence coach Shaun Edwards was quoted by Wales Online: “We are giving Dan Biggar and George North as long as possible to make the [England] game.

“There’s really bad bruising on George’s leg and the flight home didn’t help. We are worried about both of them.”

Edwards also provided contrasting updates on the fitness of Taulupe Faletau and Luke Charteris, who missed Wales’ Six Nations opener with respective knee and hand injuries.

“Taulupe will be available for selection. We have to wait on Luke Charteris. His injury is more serious,” Edwards added.

Wales are due to name their team on Thursday. England have announced the provisional retention of 24 players for their trip to Cardiff, with Jack Clifford included amid doubts over the fitness of Tom Wood, who will return to training on Thursday.

“We haven’t made our final selection call but Tom will take a full part in training [Thursday],” England defence coach Paul Gustard told Sky Sports News.

“[His training programme] was modified yesterday just to protect his injury but he will be good to go tomorrow.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT