Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

BBC presenter questions RFU's 'no losers' childrens rugby policy

(Photo by Matthew Lewis/Getty Images)

BBC Sports journalist Sonja McLaughlan has questioned a RFU policy in which there are no winners or losers in games played by children between the age of 6 and 11 years of age.

ADVERTISEMENT

The move was first introduced in 2014 by Surrey Rugby in conjunction with the RFU but has been criticised by some that view it as overly politically correct.

McLaughlan tweeted: “Watching schools rugby tournament. RFU policy dictates no winners. What do you think of that? Sport for all or learn to win and lose?”

https://twitter.com/Sonjamclaughlan/status/973916090467340288

Former England flyhalf and now pundit Andy Goode was quick to give his take on the matter, branding the policy as ‘ludicrous’.

“Ludicrous policy from the RFU! Sport (and life) is about winning and losing and striving to be successful!”

https://twitter.com/AndyGoode10/status/973917990138863617

The RFU defended the policy in 2014, saying it removed the win at all costs mentality that was creeping into age grade rugby.

The RFU’s development director Steve Grainger told Reuters at the time that: “The tournaments will still have matches which are won or lost but this is about removing the ‘win-at-all-costs mentality’ which is creeping into the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“That can lead to coaches not giving all players a game, just choosing their best players to try to win the tournament, and that will drive kids out of the sport.”

Parents of children were reported at the time to have queried if the new policy was, in fact, some sort of prank.

The vast bulk of people who responded to McLaughlan were highly critical of it, with many calling it ‘absurd’, ‘ridiculous’, ‘madness’ and ‘bonkers’.

In response to one comment defending the policy which suggested that ‘winning and losing’ can be a damaging concept for young people, Goode said: “So when these kids become young adults and they go for job interviews is it the taking part that counts?!”

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT