Northern | US

England star rebounds from Six Nations pain with double in Saracens demolition

Henry Arundell of Bath/ PA
Comments
Comment

Gallagher Prem champions Bath left no doubt about their appetite for another title as they swept Saracens aside 62-15 at the Rec to regain top spot.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Londoners started brightly and did not lack for effort but Bath’s killer instinct earned them nine tries in front of another capacity crowd. Scotland’s Finn Russell kicked 17 points from seven conversions and a penalty.

Russell and club skipper Ben Spencer were straight back into action after ultimately frustrating Six Nations campaigns with their respective countries.

VIDEO

Saracens were quickest out of the blocks, charging down Spencer’s attempted box-kick and working Tobias Elliott clear for a try in the corner after just 70 seconds. Owen Farrell landed the conversion and added a penalty after 13 minutes as Bath struggled to find their rhythm.

Ollie Lawrence provided the necessary reset, first with a crash-ball surge almost to the try-line and then the tip-on for Will Muir to score in the corner from the five-metre scrum. Russell converted and delivered a prodigious 40-22 kick to pile on the pressure again.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Bath
62 - 15
Full-time
Saracens
All Stats and Data

Scotland back-row Josh Bayliss won the resulting line-out and retrieved a loose ball to evade three defenders on his way to the tryline, with Russell’s conversion putting the home side 14-10 ahead after 20 minutes.

Consecutive penalty awards against the visitors led to Alfie Barbeary exploiting an opening from a catch-and-drive for the third Bath try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Back came Saracens with a Theo Dan breakaway which forced a penalty advantage leading to a second try for Elliott.

However, a 70-metre interception try by Henry Arundell soon secured the bonus point for Bath. Russell converted and rounded off the first-half with a penalty for a 31-15 interval lead.

Saracens came out for the second half in determined mood, but when they lost possession right in front of the Bath posts the ball was cleared upfield and skipper Spencer seized his chance to score in the corner.

Russell was wide with the kick but had no problem converting Kepu Tuipulotu’s score after 54 minutes as the formidable Bath bench took the game out of the visitors’ reach. Another sweeping counter-attack gave Arundell his second try 10 minutes later, with Russell’s conversion bringing up the 50 points.

ADVERTISEMENT

England flanker Guy Pepper finished off a blinding move started by Russell in his own 22 and carried on by Arundell and Lawrence. There was still time for replacement scrum-half Bernard van der Linde to race away from a ruck for an unconverted ninth try.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 41 minutes ago
Rugby's Greatest Rivalry - The stats showcase South Africa's lethal adaptability

I think the issue is much more simple than this. As you know I did not buy into the narrative that Razor was an incompetant coach. I saw real development in terms of clinical structured play. For me the players were struggling with the regimentation needed to play Black Crusader rugby and it imploded in Wellington. London however was an unfortunate confluence of injuries to our key play makers - Roigard and BB - and another brain explosion by Taylor. The failure also to develop a 6-2 bench compounded an energy deficit in the second half. DR threw out the Black Crusader regimentation in favour of his Chiefs, Glasgow and Steelers formula. It has sparked an attacking prowess we have not seen for years - but it has come at the expense of the type of structured % play that Razor was building and brought with it a high error rate. When faced with a well oiled machine like the Boks, who have been fine tuning their systems for several years, the inevitable lack of coherency is exposed. And if we reflect on the losses to Boks on this tour, we can pinpoint “moments” in the game where the Boks systems overwhelmed the ABs. So, one of the key issues with the GVF analysis is that it underestimates the signficance of context of the games and thus overestimates the real difference between the coaches and the players.

Ps to put some stats around this, I have analysed the performance efficiency of the Boks and the ABs for all the NC and GR games. This is based on an aggregate of pass / carry and tackle per point. The AB average is 4.7 and never got higher than 5.8 while the Boks averaged at 6.7 and maxed out at 8.2 in Baltimore. This supports a strong inference that the Boks systems are just inherently more efficient at this time while the ABs are still coming to grips with their new systems. It is not coincidental that the Boks lost with their lowest performance ratio for the tour at 6.4.



...

555 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close