Northern | US

Australian government boosts funding for Fijiana and Fijian Drua


(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)
Comments
2 Comments

While Fiji helped dump the floundering Wallabies out of the Rugby World Cup, Australia has announced additional funding to support Fiji’s teams in Super Rugby competitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fiji claimed their first-ever tournament victory over the Wallabies, winning their pool clash, and advanced through to the quarter-finals where they suffered a tight loss to England.

The Australian government has announced it will continue financial support to the Fiji Rugby Union that will allow the Fijian Drua and women’s side Fijiana to remain a part of the Super Rugby Pacific and Super W competitions for the next four years.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The funding is being delivered through PacificAus Sports, the Australian government’s $15.6 million high-performance sport program in the Pacific.

Support for the Drua has allowed more Fijian players to remain in their home country rather than leave to play overseas.

Fijian Drua chief executive Mark Evans said it had had a particularly big impact on female rugby players in the country, with their women’s team winning back-to-back Super W titles in 2022 and 2023.

Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka visited the NSW Rugby Union Centre of Excellence in Sydney.

The men’s team made the finals in 2023 for the first time.

“This generous funding allows us to sustain Fiji’s only professional sports franchise, the Fijian Drua, enabling us to participate in Super Rugby Pacific and Super W competitions,” Evans said at Monday’s announcement in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Since the Fijian Drua’s inception, we have fast become a real pathway for young Fijian women and men to pursue a professional career in their favourite sport (rugby) in Fiji itself, whereas previously they would have had to move ashore for these opportunities.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 17 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close