Analysis: Quade Cooper's Super return about subtleties not flashy bag of tricks
The first taste of Super Rugby in over a year for former Reds flyhalf Quade Cooper resulted in a season-building 34-27 away win for a Rebels side, who were under the pump early against a tough Brumbies side.
It wasn’t the same Quade Cooper that spearheaded the Reds in 2017, who had to try to do everything himself, it was all about the subtle touches that aided the Rebels attack without overplaying the situation. Genia played the maestro role, pulling the strings with three try assists that could have been five had two other opportunities been taken.
The level of execution was much higher than the corresponding opening Australian derby last year, and it was discernibly noticeable how much the attacking depth improved for both sides.
Everything was much flatter with runners bringing pace onto the ball, more ball-playing at the line, challenging defenders and hitting gain line with strong carries in the opening twenty minutes.
The Rebels attack was so flat it was almost forward at times, playing completely on top of the defence. We have not seen an Aussie side play this flat in years. With a star-studded backline, this is a smart tactic for the Rebels to use when their pack probably won’t dominate through carries.
Australian rugby, and by extension the Wallabies, have been plagued by depth issues in recent years (too much of it), both sides looked far more impressive with direct play from first phase attack and in phase play.
The Rebels had no right to be in the match in the first half after the Brumbies had total control early. What was a 22-19 lead could easily have been 22-7 had the home side not adapted their exit strategy.
With the wind at their backs, long driving kicks by Lealiifano had worked in pinning the Rebels deep, but a change of approach to try a contestable open side bomb turned costly as the visitors’ backs ignited on the counter when Speight lost the contest. Off the back of that break, Genia’s long ball gave centre Tom English enough time to get over from close range.
The Brumbies then tried a cross-field kick from midfielder Irae Simone in another exit situation, which was miscued and cost another seven points as the ball bounced into the hands of wing Jack Maddocks. They squandered a 10-0 lead on their own and gave up 12 points too easily.
Late in the first half, the Brumbies tried to attack width by resorting to playing with more depth and began to lose effectiveness. The halves of Lealiifano and Powell lost control of the contest with some of their decisions and execution misfires.
When Lealiifano kicked out on the full early in the second half, the Rebels had all the running for the first 10 minutes. The Rebels kept coming hard with their flat attack off Genia and Cooper.
One of Cooper’s best feature in this game was his simple short passing game that allowed centre Billy Meakes to flourish and make plays on the edge. On this pullback pass, Cooper is flat as he was all game, but squares and holds the defence nicely.
Irae Simone (12) bites on English even though Lealiifano is there and Tevita Kuridrani (13) is turned in outside. To Simone’s credit, he bails late on the tackle and stays alive, helping the Brumbies recover but Billy Meakes (12) finds Maddocks out on the edge with the cutout pass and he steaks away down to the five.
The Rebels score off another flat ball from Genia to a rampaging Anaru Rangi on the next phase from close range.
Another pullback pass from static ball opened up the Brumbies again, which would have resulted in a try to English if not for a bombed finish.
The Rebels began to open up the set-piece playbook in the last 10 minutes, using a ‘Cipriani special’ – an overload play with the 10 and the blind winger running sweep lines out the back. Cooper again showed nice touch on a short pass to Maddocks on the edge.
On the next phase, a Genia dink over the top was regathered and gave the Rebels possession inside the five.
Maddocks is calling for it on the bottom of the screen but Cooper restrains himself from going for the cross-field kick or throwing a long sailing rainbow.
Simply passing to Meakes forces Kuridrani to hold, who you can see in the first shot is beginning to slide but is turned in by the time Meakes makes the kick. By taking the short option, Cooper ensures the Brumbies centre can’t reach Maddocks while the ball sails in the air on a risky long pass or kick.
Maddocks’ acrobatic grab from Meakes’ chip kick ices the game and puts the Rebels two scores ahead.
It was a measured performance from Cooper who showed poise, control, and trust. His only turnover came when he made a break on a kick return and his offload was intercepted. It was a performance labeled by the commentators ‘the most commanding flyhalf performance in three years’.
There will be much more room for Cooper to expand his game as the season unfolds, but right now the Rebels look to have found a nice balance, running what looks to be the flattest attack in Super Rugby. Quade is back in Super Rugby and firing with his old partner Genia, and he has put forward a compelling case as the best 10 in Australia already.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
8 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
8 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
8 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
8 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
2 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to comments