Ultimately, we’re right back where we started. One Australian side has emerged as the clear front-runner in Super Rugby Pacific, and on which all hopes for snatching the trophy away from New Zealand rest.
But, it’s probably not the team we all had pencilled in back in January.
The Queensland Reds were locked in as many observers’ greatest Australian hope, but the ACT Brumbies blew them away in a dominant second-half display on Saturday night. So ruthless was their rugby just after half-time, the players were actually annoyed their 24-14, three tries-to-two win wasn’t a lot more emphatic on the scoreboard.

And that was curious in itself. Over the 80 minutes on the coldest night of rugby in Canberra this year, Queensland and the ACT threw themselves into each other in a matter more than befitting this great Australian rivalry.
As Super Rugby Pacific rose from the ashes of Covid, and the two sides continued to produce duels of Test-match intensity, I pondered whether Brumbies v Reds had become the premier Australian derby. I still think it is.
Over the past 13 matches since rugby resumed post-pandemic, Saturday’s was only the fifth time the winning margin made double figures. The Brumbies’ win was their fifth in a row over their old foes, but even though Queensland have found beating the ACT difficult in recent years, the contest has never lacked in willingness.
All of that hard work in defence really pays off when you score some points on the back of it, and yeah, coming into half-time with only one try… just would like to have seen some more points on the back of such a good defensive effort.
ABC Sport colleague and Wallabies assistant coach, Laurie Fisher, couldn’t get enough of it on our radio commentary, and as I made my way from my sideline vantage point out onto the field for some post-match reaction, the renowned ‘Godfather’ of Australian rugby waxed lyrical about what we’d just seen.
“That was every bit as good as the very best New Zealand derbies,” Fisher said.
“Gee, I thought that was a wonderful Aussie derby last night,” he reiterated on social media on Sunday morning.
“Thought the intensity and density of effort both teams (on) both sides of the ball were outstanding and the skill at speed under pressure fantastic.”
So when I got out on the field to Andy Muirhead, who was again superb on the right wing, and filled in admirably at first receiver while stand-in fly-half Declan Meredith was forced off for an early head injury assessment, it was really interesting to hear him lament missed opportunities and execution.
Having just heard Fisher’s glowing endorsement of the game, Muirhead’s immediate reaction was a strong contrast. The two views of the game weren’t mutually exclusive, but certainly felt at odds.

Scrum-half Ryan Lonergan would later express similar annoyance at periods of ‘clunkiness’, while coach Stephen Larkham thought his side should have made more of their opportunities from turnovers.
“Four line breaks that I counted, we just dropped the ball on the edge, or just as we get to that breakdown, they put a fair bit of pressure into it and turned us over,” he said.
“All of that hard work in defence really pays off when you score some points on the back of it, and yeah, coming into half-time with only one try… just would like to have seen some more points on the back of such a good defensive effort.”
And that’s also interesting in itself. The Brumbies didn’t have anywhere near as many opportunities in their opposition 22 as the Reds, yet they converted them into points way more efficiently.
The Reds dominated possession in the first half, finishing with a 65% share after being in the high seventies earlier in the half. They carried more than twice as much as the Brumbies, made 1.5 times more post-contact metres, but only got over the gain line half the time. They also made more than double the number of 22 entries as their opponents, yet only came away with the same solitary try and seven points by the interval.
If it was round four and not round 14, you might be less concerned about a team making so little of this possession glut.
Les Kiss was asked post-match about any frustration at not converting those forays into more points.
“There’s a couple of moments where we pass the ball out, or we run out, just moments where we didn’t consolidate those pressure points that gives us a bit more traction to get down the other end,” he said.
If it was round four and not round 14, you might be less concerned about a team making so little of this possession glut. That the Reds are still having that kind of trouble two weeks out from the play-offs is telling. In a season when four of their five losses have been against top three opposition, it also speaks of their inability to take that next step and meet expectations as the best Australian team.
The Brumbies’ defence was exceptional on Saturday, and despite their harsh reflections on a clinical overall performance, it can only sharpen them further for the hardest matches of the season.
Players and coaches all agreed their round 15 bye is timed very well, and gives them the perfect opportunity to rest some sore bodies ahead of perhaps the ideal pre-finals assignment: hosting the hugely improved Crusaders in Canberra in the last round of the regular schedule.

Queensland, now essentially in knockout mode over the remaining two rounds, have a cast list of injured players nearly as strong as what they’re putting out on the field. Kiss could only hope Wallabies captain Harry Wilson might have a chance of returning for the Hurricanes in Brisbane on Friday night. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto, Seru Uru, Josh Flook and Matt Faessler are all weeks away, and the Reds lost young prop Massimo de Lutiis to a wrist injury in Canberra as well.
Larkham, on the other hand, fielded a significantly stronger bench, and confirmed post-match fly-half Noah Lolesio looked to be on track to return for the Crusaders game. Luke Reimer was similarly progressing through concussion return to play protocols which should have him fit for the match too. The Brumbies’ only front-line absentees are props Blake Schoupp and Allan Ala’alatoa, who picked up a low grade calf strain against the Reds and is slated to be available “in the next couple of weeks”. Wallabies management might have an opinion on the 31-year-old’s return.
Throw the injury lists and the bench depth into a pot and stir in the 14 points the Brumbies ran in while Reds centre Hunter Paisami sat in the sin bin in that dominant second-half opening, and the result really becomes no surprise at all.
And in hindsight, neither is it any real surprise the Brumbies are yet again the best Australian team. They have a playing group which has developed together, and there was minimal change to their squad from last season. Queensland, by contrast, had six players move north from the Melbourne Rebels alone, and had a similar number of regular 2024 players move on to other teams.
By contrast, the Brumbies’ 2025 plans began as soon as they lost their 2024 semi-final. Now, they have put themselves in a tantalising position to go at least one step further.
Thanks BeeMc. As youre aware, imo the Reds are some ways before they lift to expectations. Im afraid now that the coach has new responsibilities, Im unsure how they are going to continue this path
Completely valid concerns, RC.
And I’m sure you’re not alone with those sentiments..
Yeah, what else is new? Water is wet.
Well, at least you took the time to leave a comment, SM..
Thanks for that Brett, and the insights on the 8/9 and Devlin pods. At least Martin knows where you work now!
Most interesting insight for me is how McKellar tends to be much better in year two.
In the SRAU days I thought it was just a matter of time until the Reds overtook the Ponies, and then that they'd done it ahead of schedule. I think that Tupou getting injured and not regaining his form was huge for them, they relied so much on him.
It will be interesting to see how the Reds view their 2025 season, JD..
I thought that game was so fiercely contested that you are fully justified, Brett, in saying “the two sides (continued)continue to produce duels of Test-match intensity.
As a Qlder I have found this season very disappointing, with the team not having really moved forward from last year. And even more disappointing with the Rebels players, two of whom are returning to the Reds, all coming in and adding to the squad significantly. Daugunu especially has come back a far better player than he was previously.
I see this team as one that has the capability to beat any of the other Australian sides well, and that includes the Brumbies. It is so often the one mistake, the poor decision, the breakdown of a skill, that has cruelled this team.
But saying all that, this year there is no question the Brumbies are the premier team in the country, and I congratulate Stephen Larkham and his coaching team…always more than just the chief coach…on their season this far, and will certainly support them going forward….but not against the Reds ofc !!
I’m afraid though, that I can’t see any of either the Brumbies or the Reds winning a crunch game in NZ against any of the Chiefs, Hurricanes, or Crusaders, and would see the Blues and MP….if they make the playoffs….. hard to beat as well. The speed and accuracy of those NZ sides at the breakdown is, imo, way above any of our sides.
Thanks for the article, Brett, and am pleased to see more comment and debate this time.
Great comment Mzil, and I share plenty of these sentiments.
I thought the Reds could finish top 2 this year, I really did. They had strengthened their squad in areas they had been previously deficient, it was another year together, and I just though this was their year.
And yes, injuries has set them back. But in truth, their playing style has been underwhelming this season, relying on a direct ‘go through the middle’ approach that has worked well in previous season, but not any more.
You know who else is struggling with this same method? The Blues.
The season review is going to have to be brutal at the end of June, and changes will have to be made for 2026, because Queensland can’t afford another underwhelming year of disappointment..
The Brumbies against the Crusaders in the last round is simply enormous. The loser of that game definitely misses out on finishing 1st, probably misses out on a top 2 spot. I wasn’t following rugby when the Crusaders and Brumbies had arguably the best rivalry in the Super12 era so a semi or final between the two sides would be cool with all due respect to the Chiefs.
This has to be the Brumbies best chance in years. Win one match at home and they'll stay there for the quarter and semi - even the final if the Chiefs slip up in any of their next four matches. Let's see whether they are good enough
Mitch, if you have Stan, may I recommend watching the 2004 Brumbies v Crusaders gain..it was an epic..so many generational Wallabies for the Brumbies and Saders
It's simultaneously surprising and unsurprising from a Brumbies perspective. Their attacking shape looks excellent and they seem to be executing and reading well, but I guess that means their bar is higher.
Other thing that stood out to me again is how well established RV is. He looks very confident and in control. Knows what he can do both ways. A class above.
Agree on RV, PM. He will be a key player against the Lions, one of the corner stones Schmidt must build the challenge around.
Yeah, nice comment PM.
What’s more remarkable about Rob Valetini, is that by his own admission, he had a slow start to the season..
Larkham is an impressive coach. The fact that the Brumbies chose continuation over adding a whole lot of tempting players from the Rebels to their roster shows that there is a plan on how to build the squad and also is a strong indicator of stability at the franchise. Larkham does not panic and has instilled the tenets of test rugby in this lot. It starts with the work done up front and ends with the flair in the backs. Theres no cutting corners or trying to play too much. There is never any panic and there is an unfaltering quiet belief and determination in the team that comes from the coach. Its calm and pragmatic rugby. One can see that the time spent with Jake White early on in his career and then his time at Munster more recently has deeply shaped him. He is a more impressive coach than Kiss and I cannot believe that he was not given a shot at the job. He has all the makings of a top international coach and deserves that role at some point whether it comes with Australia or a side willing to give him a shot.
What Stephen Larkham’s coaching ceiling stands at is an interesting debate, SK. I think your thoughts and observations on him in the first part of your comment are fair and on target. From where I sit though, it is hard to compare him with Kiss. The latter is only in his second season in SR. But his experience and time in the game is superior to Larkham’s. But a lot of his time has been in a supporting role, not chief coach. And in that he has been with top sides, The Boks and the rapidly rising Irish under Schmidt.
He came to an Ulster side when they were well on the way down a slippery slope, one that for me is sad, as in my first 30 years of life I watched a team that frequently beat Leinster, and both Munster and Connacht feared. At London Irish I felt Kiss was building well, but then the club collapsed financially. His first year with the Reds saw very big improvement, until the poor game in the playoffs in Hamilton.
It is a pity the Kiss appointment is not clear cut, that he is the undisputed best choice. There are rumours floating around that Englishman Stuart Lancaster was close to being the WB’s coach. In fact more than rumours, as I believe Lancaster has commented himself on the issue. I would have been happy with him, with Les Kiss as DoR….not my original thought, that came from an article by a highly respected writer on the game. And Harry Jones put forward a strong case for bringing back Michael Cheika.
To clarify SK, and I think I’ve outlined this previously, either in writing or in a reply to comments, but it wasn’t necessarily a choice the Brumbies made - they couldn’t.
At the time the Rebels players became available, the Brumbies already had 30 or 31 players contracted for 2025, as well as commitments to promote a couple of academy players. So they already had 33 or 34 of their 36 contract spots filled.
So they only added David Feliuai and Tuaina Taii Tualima because they were the only players they could fit in.
That is, they didn’t really prioritise continuity, because arguably they got caught out and were perhaps over-committed to be able to react to the market…
Nice observations on Larkham, though.
The competition this year has been close as evidenced by the best performing sides having already lost at least 3 times. Brumbies are certainly in the mix and not easy beats. It is even possible that the eventual winner is not currently in the top 3.
“It is even possible that the eventual winner is not currently in the top 3.” I certainly hope so, Cantab….Qld. bias ofc 😀
Oh, now there’s a concept Cantab! 😮
Let’s play this out a bit, who do you have in mind as being capable of winning from outside the current top 3?
Underestimated every year and yet…
A fair assessment AlliAnz.
It does speak for the quality of the Brumbies program, that even with minimal change to their squad, they’ve been able to make yet more adjustments to not just keep in touch with squads now stronger on paper, but to now go past them..