1
World Rugby measures produce more bang for your buck
By Jon Newcombe
Twenty-one matches fell under the Autumn Nations Series banner and, as usual with the end-of-year Test window, some of the matches were absolute crackers, while others had virtually been forgotten about and consigned to rugby’s equivalent of Room 101 no sooner had the final whistle been blown.
ADVERTISEMENT
The new law trials introduced by World Rugby earlier in the year were rolled out in November, with the same aim of quickening up the game and reducing the amount of ‘dead’ time in matches.
Whilst official figures have yet to be announced, it seems that speeding up the time it takes to form a lineout or a scrum, amongst other measures, has had the desired effect.
Only three of the 48 matches at Rugby World Cup 2023 topped 40 minutes of game time and the average per match was just 34 minutes 18 seconds, while in the Autumn Nations Series just under a quarter of games (four out of 21) fell into that category and the average ball-in-play time went up by 8% (37 minutes, 11 seconds).
Increased ball-in-play time does not always make for a better spectacle or equate to entertainment, but the chances are you’ll get more for your money than stodgy, stop-start affairs.
Referees are often sticklers for following new law trials to the letter in the early stages of a competition/new Test windows, and, interestingly, three of the four 40 minutes-plus matches were in the first eight matches. Only one of the last 13 passed the ‘BIP’ barometer.
ADVERTISEMENT
As a contest, Wales’ record 52-20 home defeat to Australia was as one-sided as they come and suffered as a spectacle as a result. However, it was the match with the highest BIP time over the Autumn Nations Series, clocking 42 minutes and 19 seconds.
All four of the highest-ranking matches were of a similar ilk. The ball was in play for 41 minutes and 14 seconds in Argentina’s 50-18 win away to Italy and France’s 52-12 win at home to Japan, while Scotland’s 57-17 rout of Fiji at Murrayfield clocked 41 minutes, two seconds.
In terms of entertainment, the two best games were arguably Australia’s dramatic 42-37 comeback win against England and France’s 30-29 victory against the All Blacks. The Ella-Mobbs Cup match ranked sixth for BIP (39 mins, 44 secs), while the Paris epic was down in 12th (37 mins, 15 secs).
Only one match fell below 30 minutes for BIP time (29 mins, 33 secs) – Scotland’s 27-13 win over Australia, which was anything but a dud.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a painful November for long-suffering England fans, meanwhile, who paid through the nose to watch three matches that featured in the bottom 10 for BIP time.
Arguably the worst game from an entertainment point of view was the error-strewn contest between Ireland and New Zealand. That ranked third-bottom for BIP time, at 31 mins and 54 secs.
Data source: Opta
Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players and let us know what you think!
none of the top5-ball-in-play games were particularly captivating or thrilling .... so I am not too convinced in ball-in-play-time being singled out as a measure for entertainment ....
Take IRE lying all over the ruck coupled with a referee who seemed unable to use the yellow card to change behaviour, then you end up with a stop-start mess.
Ball in play is ridiculous requirement, some of tge best games I've seen have been complained about due to low bip. Also seen games where the big has been high, but the game was like watching paint dry. Stop tampering with the game, if you keep this up, the game will look like league and league IMHO sucks. Rinse dry repeat.
Yip, BIP is a nothing metric, it’s the stopages that count (which is what improves games).
Whoop-de-doo.
A slow burn, intense test match is as appealing as a surprise a minute fun fest.
World rugby must stop effing around with rule changes and focus on:
- referee training and development.
- player well being.
- growing the game and giving tier 2s more airtime.
Right now, the quality of refereeing is the biggest variable affecting my enjoyment of the game. Which includes the speed at which refs allow the game to flow.
If the ref allows a team (whom I won’t mention names) to clog up rucks like a drain pipe in Alexandra, then the game is sh1t.
It was much better during the autumn series but some teams (whom I won’t mention names) still lay about in rucks like floppy, beheaded fish.
Teams that d1ck around at scrum time, obviously delaying the inevitable smash from the boks in particular, should also be penalized.
If World Rugby would like more insights, they are welcome to DM me and I’ll gladly consult to them. In particular, I’d add tremendous value if I could attend most of the 6N and RC games to collect data.
Do you mean application? Or are you referring to last years law changes like the free kick stuff?
Were do you see ruck improvement happening, law application or law change?
It would be interesting to see who reffed each game. I feel who the ref is determines the amount of time in play.
100%
Four of the top 7 matches were refereed by Kiwis (Ben O'Keeffe with two just outside the top 5)
Top 5
James Doleman
Matthew Carley
Damian Schneider
Craig Evans
Paul Williams
Bottom 5
Chris Busby
Craig Evans
Nic Berry
Andrew Brace
Hollie Davidson
I nearly did that! I’ll post the top 5/bottom 5 here when I get chance