Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Woodward lauds Italy's 'innovative' tactics against England

Kyle Sinckler of England is tackled by Italy’s Luke McLean

Italy’s ‘no-ruck’ tactics drew the ire of England coach Eddie Jones, but Clive Woodward felt their strategy was “innovative and inspired”.

During Sunday’s Six Nations encounter at Twickenham, Italy opted not to compete at the breakdown and instead attempted to steal the ball from the scrum-half, causing confusion in the England ranks.

Jones, whose side fought back from 10-5 down at half-time to win 36-15, insisted it was “not rugby” and called for intervention from World Rugby, but Conor O’Shea hit out at criticism and defended his side’s approach.

Woodward, who led England to World Cup glory in 2003, commended Italy for having the bravery to try and outfox a superior opponent in such a way.

“I totally support Italy and their use of their innovative and inspired tactics at Twickenham on Sunday, it was one of those rare moments in Test rugby that, as a former coach and player, make you sit bolt upright in your seat and think, ‘Wow, this is different, this is new’,” Woodward wrote in The Daily Mail.

“What we did see at Twickenham was a very gutsy and clever, if ultimately unsuccessful, response from a wounded Italy side that felt under pressure.

“Against a superior team and a rugby nation with infinitely more resources, Italy went down fighting and scheming and plotting. It was behind the lines – literally – guerrilla war and I found it compulsive viewing. It’s what David always has to do if he is to stand any chance against Goliath.

“And Conor O’Shea is absolutely right about it being wrong for people to jump on this, because Italy have had the guts to utilise the tactic for 80 minutes at a packed Twickenham.

“If New Zealand or one of the big boys had come up with it in a big game, we would be hailing a tactical master-stroke.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT