Northern | US

'What are they doing?!': Six Nations rebrand panned on X

Peter O'Mahony of Ireland lifts the Six Nations Trophy following the team's victory during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Ireland and Scotland at Aviva Stadium on March 16, 2024 in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

The Guinness Six Nations became the latest rugby brand to revamp itself with a “supercharged” orange identity ahead of the 2025 campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

The warm colour palette was chosen to reflect the feeling of “optimism the fans feel when getting together at the end of winter” to experience the Six Nations.

Extensive research was undertaken ahead of the rebrand, with “fans, target audience members, Unions and Federations, and international rugby players” engaged.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The logo formalises the gender identity of the men’s version of the Six Nations with a capital “M”, aligning with the women’s version.

The rebrand has caused angst on X with exisiting Six Nations fans highly critical of the new look.

Daily Mail rugby writer Chris Foy called it an “abomination” and asked “what are they doing?!”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fans were equally unimpressed: “There is absolutely no way this passed market testing… if it ‘did’ – I can only imagine it was done by an agency who were allowed to mark their own homework.”

Another fan wrote: “Genuinely one of the worst things I’ve ever seen. Bravo.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The rebrand brings the men’s tournament branding in line with the women’s and U20 style, with all three competitions using the same font and bold colour type.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 28 minutes ago
Why Rassie will be happier than Rennie with early omens of Greatest Rivalry tour

To be completely honest Nick the scrum is a mess and thats entirely world rugbys fault. They need to help the refs and players out. For starters World rugby needs to mandate a minimum scrum height which will resolve overextending issues and the whole thing flopping like a bad souffle. Secondly they need to mandate bind freindly jerseys with specific binding points on them and toughened materials which allow props to bind and grip easily. perhaps they should also mandate that all props wear specific binding gloves. If they can get rid of overextension and loss of bind then that takes out a huge host of resets. Its crazy to think but when you look back at 95 the scrums set extremely fast with fewer collapses. The whole process was simplified. We can never go back to that but we can stop buggering around and make it easier for props to keep the scrum up and keep their binds. The maul law changes are interesting but why 1 year out from the world cup? The new laws make it impossible not to concede a pen against a team that swivels and shifts the maul which most top teams do to change the point of attack. The best way to defend now I suppose is to have players in the maul and players out of it. As one disengages from the side another hits from the back thereby keeping the same amount of players in without swimming up the side. The disengaged player then goes back to the back ready to engage again. ready to engage again. This is hardly an ideal defence and sucks more numbers into the maul. Feel like the refs have been short changed to be honest.

93 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close